1
Originality / Re: 1969 Small Block Smog Pump Cradle
« Last post by ZLP955 on Today at 10:43:27 AM »Thanks Bentley, that'd be a great reference - right timeframe too, my car is early April!
News:
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and
you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
Classified ads are not allowed on the forum.
Recent Posts
2
General Discussion / Re: Typical price value for a 67 convertible.
« Last post by bcmiller on Today at 07:33:41 AM »You posted a pic of the VIN, but a search would not have seen the VIN.
Kurt posted the VIN in text. A search will find that.
Kurt posted the VIN in text. A search will find that.
3
Originality / Re: 69 RS Washer Bottle Bracket Fasteners
« Last post by Edgemontvillage on Today at 04:57:20 AM »Bringing this back up, a couple weeks ago at swap meet I found a washer bottle, cap bracket and RS bracket with 2 out of the 3 caps intact so I bought it - check this thread for measurements and more pis if y'all need -Lloyd?
http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=452.msg5985#msg5985
James the guy that had them made up is he selling these? I know its been 3 years
and lastly do y'all wanna know how much its was?
$1
The simulated caps that were on the 10 10 RS/Z survivor (that James made up?) were discarded when I discovered they were not original. They appeared to be made from a fiberous material (rather than plastic per the originals) so I replaced them with an original set I located at the time.
4
General Discussion / Re: XXB suffix code
« Last post by abad69 on Today at 04:56:14 AM »Ed, I just closed the deal on the RSSS350 and will start moving stuff to my place sat, 140 mile trip to Henderson. It is a solid project and comes with two garages full of parts. I figure three pickups full.
I know the 657 will work, my dilemma is will the XXB suffix code work for a 350 or did they just use it for the 327? as per the crank, I was going to have the mains on the crank machined to sj but when I told that to a good friend who is very savvy about such things, he just said "duh, don't you think it would be better to make the line bore large journal". I think I will go with the "duh" idea. Thanks again for your help with this info. and if you know if they used the XXB code on the 350 let me know. Jim
I know the 657 will work, my dilemma is will the XXB suffix code work for a 350 or did they just use it for the 327? as per the crank, I was going to have the mains on the crank machined to sj but when I told that to a good friend who is very savvy about such things, he just said "duh, don't you think it would be better to make the line bore large journal". I think I will go with the "duh" idea
. Thanks again for your help with this info. and if you know if they used the XXB code on the 350 let me know. Jim5
General Discussion / Re: Big block fan shroud
« Last post by rare396bronze on Today at 03:52:11 AM »I have worked for gm parts for 32 years. Never seen 67-69 Camaro shroud with out part number cast in the shroud. That is the way i would check in the shroud. But i have seen one were the hole was not drilled. We sent it back to gm as defective. So i would say anything is possible as far as the hole. Also checked 2 nos shrouds have 3 beads one used does not have not have bead's all stamped with part #3947619. Hope this helps.
6
General Discussion / Re: motor mounts
« Last post by 169INDY on Today at 03:19:43 AM »Just to add, when I purchased mine I found them very inexpensive made by Anchor Industries, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio and is who made them for GM. Anchor Industries #2249 seems to be made as the originals.
Rock Auto $5.85
7
General Discussion / Re: Pictures
« Last post by pjbizjak on Today at 03:04:34 AM »Hi Chick, well I've been talking about my 68 04A Z/28 for some time and I 'm going to post some pictures soon if I can find out how to.
Pete
Pete
8
General Discussion / photos
« Last post by pjbizjak on Today at 03:01:38 AM »How do I send pictures via my phone within a post?
9
General Discussion / Re: Typical price value for a 67 convertible.
« Last post by 67CruiseMaster on Today at 02:44:00 AM »Yes Kurt. Why did you repost it? Didn't I do it correctly? I see my 09C build Emerald turquoise seat belts made it into your belt research post. Nice.
Scot
Scot
10
General Discussion / Re: Typical price value for a 67 convertible.
« Last post by KurtS on Today at 02:21:42 AM »124677N178719