CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 06, 2015, 02:38:58 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
110476 Posts in 12763 Topics by 4892 Members
Latest Member: jvc7450
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Recent Posts
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]

 on: March 01, 2015, 06:26:23 PM 
Started by ko-lek-tor - Last post by bergy
Happy birthday John from a fellow GM alum!

 on: March 01, 2015, 05:49:41 PM 
Started by dannystarr - Last post by KurtS
If they are not registered, then he would he not forfeit the right to use them?

 on: March 01, 2015, 05:28:37 PM 
Started by FortLangleyBC - Last post by bcmiller
Hi Dannystar -
Yes purchased from Norm Meads - a very nice gentleman. He is a long time friend of Jerry M.
I am still on the hunt for another first gen Z - 69 or maybe even a 67...any leads would be appreciated.
Thanks for the kinds words & have a great day!

Nice car.

Remember that there are other people looking for cars too and there is a limited supply. 

 on: March 01, 2015, 04:30:38 PM 
Started by bcmiller - Last post by bcmiller
Yes, it appears that at least part of that axle assembly information was stamped at least twice on that particular housing.

 on: March 01, 2015, 04:18:38 PM 
Started by bcmiller - Last post by BULLITT65
I understand, just trying to piece it all together like everyone else on here. Some things are easy to extrapolate, others are still puzzling.
Also in looking at the pic you posted from reply #69 on this thread, it looks like the "C" was double stamped (look to the left), and possibly some other numbers as well?

 on: March 01, 2015, 03:41:10 PM 
Started by FortLangleyBC - Last post by 1968RSZ28
Here is another car you can have fun with FtLangley if you are still up on bucks, get this one too.

VIN: 124378N398518


 on: March 01, 2015, 03:34:08 PM 
Started by BillOhio - Last post by BillOhio
I found the picture I was looking for. Looks like the blackout has a lot of white over spray on this car.

 on: March 01, 2015, 03:17:07 PM 
Started by bcmiller - Last post by bcmiller
I added the cast date to the 0806 axle and added an 0818 axle too.

Thanks Kurt!

 on: March 01, 2015, 03:16:32 PM 
Started by FortLangleyBC - Last post by BillOhio
Ebay car block is 306 my 69 is 307 my dads birthday. Probably good its not the same day!!

 on: March 01, 2015, 03:16:29 PM 
Started by bcmiller - Last post by bcmiller
I am going to give my opinion but JohnZ or someone else may be able to answer better.

A complete rear axle for service/warranty would have an assembly stamp with ratio code.  These would not be common, in fact they would probably be pretty RARE. 

In most cases, only the bad parts would be replaced.  For example, see the post made by rszmjt above.  It appears that just the housing was replaced and other parts were reused.
A bare housing for service/warranty - would not have received an assembly stamp at the axle plant since it was not "an assembly".

Austin, I don't have an answer to every question and it is probably not in our best interest to answer every question anyway.  Those searching for information on how to restamp parts can see the same posts that we can.  That is why certain details about how or why tags / or drivetrain stamps were made or specific details will not be discussed.  Sorry, but that is the way it is. 

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.068 seconds with 15 queries.