Author Topic: tag seem correct?  (Read 14209 times)

harddock

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #15 on: November 03, 2010, 11:17:43 PM »
Apparantly the PO had a couple cars and the info he gave me was wrong and not for my car as that tag was still on the other car. The correct cowl tag was hunted down, found at the body shop and sent to me. The car is a 5C  NOR138011  OO paint and 749   seats.

Gramps69Z

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 653
  • 69 X33 D80
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #16 on: November 03, 2010, 11:24:52 PM »
 Post a picture and let the experts see it.
Captain John Wykoff
Destin Fire:   October 31, 2015 at 0700--Officially Retired

tom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1146
    • View Profile
    • Discount Internet Services
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #17 on: November 04, 2010, 02:44:36 AM »
So the seller says wrong dated tag is still on the other car. But you can have a correct dated tag that calls for different inside and outside colors. Does "buyer beware" sound like good advice?
69 X11 Z21 L14 glide
looking for a 69 export model (KPH) speed
o

Gramps69Z

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 653
  • 69 X33 D80
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #18 on: November 04, 2010, 02:59:53 AM »
So the seller says wrong dated tag is still on the other car. But you can have a correct dated tag that calls for different inside and outside colors. Does "buyer beware" sound like good advice?

And I bet the tag is a reproduction.
Are suppose to take the wrong tag off and send it back?
Please excuse my ignorance, but what does PO stand for?
Captain John Wykoff
Destin Fire:   October 31, 2015 at 0700--Officially Retired

1968RSZ28

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6188
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #19 on: November 04, 2010, 06:25:24 AM »
Please excuse my ignorance, but what does PO stand for?

My guess, Police Officer...  ???

Paul

harddock

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #20 on: November 04, 2010, 11:26:58 AM »
The story sounds f'd up but if you were here it makes  sense.  Short story is there were two cars. two tags. I have the correct one. The Previous Owner (PO) wasn't pulling anything.

IZRSSS

  • Guest
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #21 on: November 04, 2010, 12:51:20 PM »
My guess...Previous Owner  ???

bertfam

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4492
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #22 on: November 04, 2010, 06:39:32 PM »
Now that you have the tag, post a picture. I haven't researched it completely (and I could be wrong), but that body number still seems off for that VIN.

Ed

harddock

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #23 on: November 09, 2010, 12:05:24 AM »
Here it is

Gramps69Z

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 653
  • 69 X33 D80
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #24 on: November 09, 2010, 12:31:07 AM »
The experts need to chime in on this one.
Captain John Wykoff
Destin Fire:   October 31, 2015 at 0700--Officially Retired

harddock

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #25 on: November 09, 2010, 01:20:50 AM »
backside

KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5881
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #26 on: November 09, 2010, 02:23:31 PM »
A twisted series of events, but I believe it's the original tag.

Glad to help get the right one! :)
Kurt S
CRG

harddock

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #27 on: November 09, 2010, 02:58:57 PM »
Thanks, now that I have it should it be painted the color of the car before reinstalling ( car is already painted) and if I understand correctly I need factory type rivets that get pushed in place and the sealed with black sealer?

 

anything