Author Topic: tag seem correct?  (Read 4754 times)

harddock

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
tag seem correct?
« on: October 25, 2010, 05:21:31 PM »
1968 Camaro  vin 124378N438140

Cowl 5B     NOR 130556

712  AA

Car is black V8 with Std int. Not sure if cowl tag is repo and can't post picture right now

tom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1144
    • View Profile
    • Discount Internet Services
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2010, 06:40:33 PM »
When you can post the pucture. You will find out if it is original or fake.
69 X11 Z21 L14 glide
looking for a 69 export model (KPH) speed
o

harddock

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2010, 08:56:30 PM »
When I get the car, I am more concerned with the info being correct

JohnZ

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4250
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2010, 05:10:27 PM »
When I get the car, I am more concerned with the info being correct

You can decode the cowl tag yourself on the CRG main site, here:

http://www.camaros.org/numbers.shtml
'69 Z/28
Fathom Green
CRG

Ed B

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2010, 06:09:09 PM »
Quote
When I get the car, I am more concerned with the info being correct

Quote
You can decode the cowl tag yourself on the CRG main site

However, I'm always leary of late cars with AA paint. Post a picture and we can tell you more.

Ed

harddock

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2010, 03:15:59 PM »
I am mainly looking to see if the VIN, Body number and date code seem to line up.

KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3517
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2010, 02:39:40 AM »
Not sure if cowl tag is repo and can't post picture right now
I am mainly looking to see if the VIN, Body number and date code seem to line up.
Those are 2 different questions. Without a pic, I can't comment on the originality of the tag.

But the #'s do not line up.
Kurt S
CRG

harddock

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #7 on: October 31, 2010, 04:00:15 PM »
Why do you say the numers are wrong?

KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3517
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #8 on: October 31, 2010, 08:08:22 PM »
Because that VIN doesn't go with that tag.

Ed B

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #9 on: October 31, 2010, 09:40:13 PM »
To elaborate on what Kurt said, your trim tag indicates your car was built the second week of May, 1968 (05B), however, your VIN indicates the car was built the third week of May, 1968 (05C), therefore one or the other has been swapped.

I would imagine it's the trim tag, but check the hidden VIN to make sure it matches the VIN on the dash, and post a picture of the trim tag.

Ed

harddock

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #10 on: October 31, 2010, 11:29:42 PM »
When I take May total production (39952) and divide by working days (22) I get 1816 cars per day. My serial # puts the car and a build of May 6 or 7 which would be week 2 not 3 or am I figuring wrong. How did you determin third week of May?  I am trying to get hold of the cowl tag but I'm not sure the PO still has it. It was taken off the car.

KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3517
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #11 on: November 01, 2010, 04:01:08 AM »
Look closer at that production data (http://www.camaros.org/geninfo.shtml#HowMany). "The data for some months (especially May and June 68 at Norwood) deviate significantly from actual build dates, while other months correlate well.
We have data on cars close to your VIN and they are not 05B.

harddock

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #12 on: November 01, 2010, 11:09:45 AM »
It did seem odd that there was such a jump in May numbers. I had used figures from another site and came up with a 13th build date but thinkng the CRG numbers to be more accurate I used their numbers for my calculation.

harddock

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #13 on: November 01, 2010, 02:46:43 PM »
It did seem odd that there was such a jump in May numbers. I had used figures from another site and came up with a 13th build date but thinkng the CRG numbers to be more accurate I used their numbers for my calculation.
If this is correct then all that is wrong is the 5B is being mistaken for a 5C?

JohnZ

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4250
    • View Profile
Re: tag seem correct?
« Reply #14 on: November 01, 2010, 03:17:39 PM »
When I take May total production (39952) and divide by working days (22) I get 1816 cars per day.

Norwood production was 912 cars per day.