Author Topic: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp  (Read 7828 times)

tim69camaro

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 165
    • View Profile
Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp
« Reply #15 on: May 17, 2007, 01:43:13 AM »
If 7029204 is the right number the search begins again for me. I finally found a 7029200 recently. I should have asked first. Don't worry Earl, I am looking for a Nov. 1968 date so we won't be competing for the same one.

The website that referenced the carb # also had the L35 districbutor as a 1111497. Is this correct?
Tim Bailey

Steve68

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 513
    • View Profile
Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp
« Reply #16 on: May 17, 2007, 01:51:17 AM »
Yes.

KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3517
    • View Profile
Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp
« Reply #17 on: May 18, 2007, 06:56:13 AM »
every book l've been reading is showing the 7049200 as the carb used for the 69 L34 325 hp. what publication are you getting the 7049204 from? thanks
I'm not. 204 is what is actually on original cars. Never seen a 200 on an original car.
Kurt S
CRG

Ejam

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 76
    • View Profile
Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp
« Reply #18 on: May 18, 2007, 06:00:57 PM »
Kurt l am not doubting you but would like to know where you seen that that was the carb for that motor.

Ejam

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 76
    • View Profile
Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp
« Reply #19 on: May 18, 2007, 06:44:24 PM »
Click here: Carb Decode

Ejam

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 76
    • View Profile
Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp
« Reply #20 on: May 18, 2007, 06:45:42 PM »

KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3517
    • View Profile
Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp
« Reply #21 on: May 20, 2007, 05:35:10 AM »
I'm looking in the CRG database. We have several 69 L35 cars that we have data on the the original carb. I also confirmed it via broadcast sheets.

tim69camaro

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 165
    • View Profile
Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp
« Reply #22 on: May 22, 2007, 11:10:49 PM »
Earl, there is one listed 7029204 on ebay right now dated 0769.

Ejam

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 76
    • View Profile
Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp
« Reply #23 on: June 01, 2007, 02:38:49 AM »
thanks tim.....l missed it  :(

beebfan

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp
« Reply #24 on: November 07, 2007, 10:18:03 PM »
I have the same car with the build date 09A, and carb. number 7029215 .
I assume that this is the factory carb. as everything else is stock on the car.
Am I incorrect thinking this?

tim69camaro

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 165
    • View Profile
Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp
« Reply #25 on: November 08, 2007, 12:00:35 AM »
Your car must be a 4 speed as the odd numbered last digit would indicate. If your car is 4 speed it is probably the right carb based on another website I found recently. The 7029204 is for automatic.

beebfan

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp
« Reply #26 on: November 08, 2007, 06:48:31 PM »
Actually my car is an automatic with 77000 on the odometer.

KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3517
    • View Profile
Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp
« Reply #27 on: November 09, 2007, 03:10:15 AM »
I do not think that's the correct carb for an auto car.

nuch_ss396

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 265
    • View Profile
Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp
« Reply #28 on: November 11, 2007, 02:16:52 AM »
L/34 is the 350hp-396.  L/35 is the 325hp-396

7029204 and 7029215 are the 396-350hp & 427-390hp carbs based on my research.

Steve
69 SS 396, Hugger Orange, D/80, D/90
Chambered Exhaust, N/66, THM400, 3:73 posi

Steve A.
  CRG

Ed B

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
    • View Profile
Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp
« Reply #29 on: November 11, 2007, 03:40:38 AM »
For 1969, the Rochester 7029204 FF Carburetor was used on the 396/325 and the 396/350 with Automatic Transmissions.

The 7029215 EH Carburetor was used on the 396/325 and the 396/350 with Manual Transmissions.

Note that both of these differ from published listings, but CRG research has shown these applications to be correct.

Ed