1969 Z/28 on Mecum

[BULLITT65]

I was looking closer at this 69Z and the putty on the rivets for the trim tag looked suspect to me. I was curious to get others opinions:https://www.mecum.com/lots/LN1122-524293/

VIN:124379N565815

[169INDY]

I think the Factory Rivet sealer usually Lacks a "Finger Print"! That is Not consistent with Factory samples Right Guys.\
LoL

[Jonesy]

I beleive that tag has been off the car and is one of the newer repop tags.

Would love to see the drive train stampings on this one.

[David K]

Nothing to see here...please keep moving....pay no attention to the finger print.

[6667ss138]

No sale at $95,000.

[william]

Now reporting sold @$104,500.

[69RALLYSPORTZ28]

I believe this was the seller as lot S104 at Mecum Las Vegas, November 2022
https://nwhouseofhardtops.com/1969-camaro-z28-orng%2Fblk

[69RALLYSPORTZ28]

Now a February 2023 listing on Ebay by the new owner.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/195587567145

[68 Ragtop]

Not one picture of the stamps that matter and a very flowery description that shows the seller has no idea what a stroker is.

[Charley]

Other than the putty in the rivets that looks like a real tag to me. Are the new repops getting that good ?

[cook_dw]

Yes they are.  I believe that is; as Jonesy mentioned, a newer repo imho.

[camaronut]

If that's a fake plate, then we're in a heap a trouble.  Have to get behind the rivets inside the cowl and take a good look.

[70z28lt1]

Pretty soon going to have to include photos like this:

[GMAD_Van Nuys]

Car is listed for sale on Hemmings and seller claims it has original engine & transmission without any photos:

https://www.hemmings.com/classifieds/dealer/chevrolet/camaro/2660733.html

[Steve Shauger]

I'd like to see pics of the tag from a few years ago if any are available. I don't see a problem with this tag. Yes they are reproducing much better tags now....