CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 27, 2014, 05:58:36 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103544 Posts in 12176 Topics by 4697 Members
Latest Member: greygoose01
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  Restoration
| | |-+  New Shell Vs Fixing mine
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2  All Print
Author Topic: New Shell Vs Fixing mine  (Read 6064 times)
camaro_ragtop
Newbie
*
Posts: 6

camaro_ragtop@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« on: October 22, 2005, 10:37:52 PM »

Hey guys,

Has anyone looked at the cost difference between repairing a basket case shell vs shelling out 12k for a new shell from Dynacorn international?

by basket case I mean I need a complete floor, rear frame rails, trunk pan, braces.... the list goes on....



on a positive note I bought a Buick Grand National to play with till the camaro is done.....

TIA
Bill
AKA Camaro_ragtop

Ontario Canada
Logged

1969 camaro convertible 
1987 Buick Grand National
2005 Pontiac Grand Prix
ogbean
Member
***
Posts: 99

thesupernova_86@hotmail.com thesupernova86@yahoo.com
View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2005, 05:59:55 PM »

ya I got the same problem with my 68 but they dont make new shells for it yet!!!
Logged

David

1968 L30 4spd Huh, Rally Green, White Vinyl Top, Ivory Houndstooth Interior (716), D55 console, D91 Stripe
tom
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1133


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2005, 12:07:19 PM »

I've considered it, especially with the labor expense of replacing panels. Also mine is a hardtop. They tell me a hardtop shell is coming, but 12 g's for a ragtop shell is a lot. Also I have been informed there are legal issues with welding in my old firewall to use the vin and such. (basically I've been told by law enforcement here in NJ that if I do that, its illegal, and they can confiscate the car)
Check your state regulations first. Since mine is a basic plain jane, not some ultra rare 6 figure model, I just bought a mig welder, and will be off to the wrecking yard or body shop for a trashed body panel to learn on. Then if all goes well, I will do my best at replacing the panels with aftermarket.

Tom
Logged

69 X11 Z21 L14 glide
looking for a 69 export model (KPH) speedo
basecoupe#79
Member
***
Posts: 38


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2005, 01:25:08 PM »

Bill, I cant remember which Magazine.  Either Hemmings Muscle cars or Hot Rod Magazine will be doing a spread on the Dynacorn Shell.  I think they are going to build one and do a story on it. 

John
Logged
camaro_ragtop
Newbie
*
Posts: 6

camaro_ragtop@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2005, 08:50:00 AM »

Thanks for  the replies, I am still very much on the fence on this.... I'm not even sure if it's about the money as much as what the finished product will look like, I have no problem with the welding but lining up the panels is no easy task....

Logged

1969 camaro convertible 
1987 Buick Grand National
2005 Pontiac Grand Prix
RickH
Member
***
Posts: 105


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2005, 09:16:41 AM »

Also I have been informed there are legal issues with welding in my old firewall to use the vin and such. (basically I've been told by law enforcement here in NJ that if I do that, its illegal, and they can confiscate the car)

Tom


Actually that is not true. It is perfectly legal to repair the damaged part with an aftermarket piece and if that part happens to be a firewall section or dash panel you can repair the area and replace your VIN, trim tag or whatever. The replacement body's are considered repair parts.

The manufacturer of the body's has worked out the legal issues according to federal guidlines.

Rick H.
Logged
waynechipman
Member
***
Posts: 66


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2005, 02:33:24 PM »

Hot Rod has an article on it. It has different VIN stamped on the body If anyone ever checks they will see you have an aftermarket body. If you have or are a good welder I would fix any body over buying the aftermarket shell. G. M. is wrong in allowing them to be called Camaros they should be called kit cars just like the AC Cobras. The Camaros that have and will die should be allowed to die. The aftermarket kit body should not be allowed to be called a Camaro. G.M. did not build it.
Logged
ckresto
Newbie
*
Posts: 18


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: November 24, 2005, 11:30:45 AM »

I could see buying a new body if you don't care about originality, and are going to stuff in some funky drive train.  But, I think if you are doing a restoration that you should live with the original.  I think finding a better junk body to start with and then make 2 caes out of one is a better idea.  I also agree that this should be labeled a kit car.  You know someone somewhere is going to get screwed thinking he has an original. 
Logged
waynechipman
Member
***
Posts: 66


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: December 11, 2005, 02:51:54 AM »

I LOOKED AT THE ARTICLE IN HOTROD ON BUILDING THE FAKE cAMARO. wHAT A PILE OF GARBAGE, IF AT ALL POSSIBLE RESTORE AN ORIGINAL BODY. They buy the subassemblies from the asian markets. Then they make them out of thinner guage metal. ( They come up with BS about the metal being less brittle, so to save twenty dollars in scrap tin they give you this thinner garbage) I have a NOS fender that was made in the 90s and it is same guage as original. Now I suppose GM had tin from the sixties around. I dont think so. If modern tin is so much better why did GM stamp new fenders out of full guage metal. Remember all asian tin is made from the ground up cars and appliances we send overseas. And what a hokey bondo bucket the hotrod staff put together I would have been ashamed to have put that in my magazine. If anyone offered one of theses garbage heaps up for sale I would run from it Just like owners of theses thin guage cars are going to run from a little surface rust pitting. Original Gm metal will take quite a bit of pitting before losing structural integrity. Just because these guys talk like they know what they are talking about dont make it so. I wonder how much Dynacorn payed HotRod to plug their asian pile of garbage
Logged
JohnZ
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 4072


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: December 11, 2005, 11:49:20 AM »

<< Now I suppose GM had tin from the sixties around. I dont think so. If modern tin is so much better why did GM stamp new fenders out of full guage metal. Remember all asian tin is made from the ground up cars and appliances we send overseas. >>

It's not a matter of "having tin from the sixties around" - the print calls for a given sheet thickness, and that's what the draw, trim, flange, and pierce dies are designed to work with. Steel sheet is available in any thickness you specify, and there's nothing "special" about the sheet gauge used in the 60's; many different gauges of steel sheet are used in different parts of the car. Domestic steel isn't "virgin" either - normally it's about 40%-50% recycled material, and has been for decades; the alloying materials are what gives it specific properties.  Smiley
Logged

'69 Z/28
Fathom Green
CRG
waynechipman
Member
***
Posts: 66


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: December 11, 2005, 02:44:11 PM »

Read my statement a little closer I said nothing about tin from the sixties being special. The point I was making is GM stamped replacement fenders out of a thicker guage than the garbage dynacorn is stamping them out of. So to save a tiny bit of money they are pushing thin guage garbage on to people. And no one can convince me that asian ( not japanese. Jap crap is bad enough on its own) garbage has any redeeming qualitys other than being cheap. It would be nice to see Dynacorn ( I should say Dynacrap ) go belly up, and GM along with them. I will not ever buy a new GM after they put their name on this asian garbage. Since GM is copying Toyotas totally ugly front lights it would be nice to see Toyota  put GM under.
Logged
waynechipman
Member
***
Posts: 66


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: December 13, 2005, 12:05:20 AM »

Remember everyone, the USA used to outproduce the whole World in manufactured goods. There is a reason, when You buy a Knife and its say USA on it You will pay a whole lot more than if it says China on it. But ole slick Willy decided for bribe money to Gut America. I try to buy American goods but nowadays that is real hard to do. I bought a purolater fuel filter a while back and it said made in Russia, that is insane. And it was warped at one end, I will never again buy any purolater product
Logged
zigman
Newbie
*
Posts: 12

reborn

zigman111@hotmail.com zigman1962
View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: March 01, 2006, 03:21:00 PM »

so do tell us  waynechipman, when you restore your car, what do you have outback a GM nos depot in your backyard??? what , you never used after market? come on
Logged

thanks , mark
project69
Member
***
Posts: 23


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #13 on: March 08, 2006, 07:32:24 AM »

buy one of these for 1,700...
Logged

waynechipman
Member
***
Posts: 66


View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: April 03, 2006, 08:45:25 PM »

No I dont Zigman I just sold a NOS fender for 1000 though and I can see why they sell for so much. I am waiting for better fenders to come along am hearing through grapevine that they might be appearing, or maybe its just a dream  who knows have to wait and see
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.365 seconds with 18 queries.