CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 25, 2014, 03:56:13 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105762 Posts in 12346 Topics by 4757 Members
Latest Member: chelltab
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  Decoding/Numbers
| | |-+  Another transmission ID
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Another transmission ID  (Read 2203 times)
69 skunk
Member
***
Posts: 22



View Profile Email
« on: July 24, 2008, 01:52:05 PM »

  I would like mine decoded too. http://i325.photobucket.com/albums/k391/TEAMDILLON/IMG_0003_1.jpg  I can understand the POM29A and I assume the 10w123986 is the vin from original car but what does the CT9 and the A41373 mean?
Logged
Ed Bertrand
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 2333


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 25, 2008, 10:08:35 AM »

The CT9 and A41373 have no meaning that I know of. Maybe rebuilders stampings?

Ed
Logged
JohnZ
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 4125


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: July 25, 2008, 10:14:43 AM »

The CT9 and A41373 have no meaning that I know of. Maybe rebuilders stampings?

Ed


Strange - it has a VIN from a '70 Nova, and also has a 5/50 warranty replacement identification (the CT9  A41373); must have been made originally at Muncie in 1969 as a 5/50 replacement, and wound up being shipped to Willow Run instead.
Logged

'69 Z/28
Fathom Green
CRG
KurtS
CRG Coordinator
*****
Posts: 3251


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: July 25, 2008, 10:20:23 AM »

CT normally indicates a service trans.
http://www.camaros.org/trans.shtml#ReplacementTransmissions

The only plausible explanation here is the trans made it into a car and then had a problem (probably in the assembly plant). It was then returned to Muncie who rebuilt it and shipped it as a service part (probably for 69 Camaro or Corvette, since they had extended production runs in 69). Interesting it got stamped with both years.

I've seen this once before (all the same year though).
Logged

Kurt S
CRG
Ed Bertrand
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 2333


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 25, 2008, 11:10:48 AM »

Thanks boys. I had forgotten about the warranty stampings!

Ed
Logged
KurtS
CRG Coordinator
*****
Posts: 3251


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: July 25, 2008, 09:04:06 PM »

I don't think a service part would make it to the assembly plant. Whereas an assembly part that needed repair would make it into back to Muncie and then into the service system.

Either way, it's not an ordinary occurence.
Logged

Kurt S
CRG
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.078 seconds with 17 queries.