Author Topic: 124379N561026 in database??  (Read 36159 times)

Iluv69s

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 84
    • View Profile
124379N561026 in database??
« on: January 19, 2008, 07:14:19 PM »
just looked at 69 Z for sale...any info on car?? Im suspicious...Thanks

KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5881
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2008, 10:08:35 PM »
No, nothing on that car.
Kurt S
CRG

Iluv69s

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 84
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2008, 12:31:10 AM »
Thanks Kurt,

   well..this will tell me alot... I got a pic!!  I'm curious what you think about the tag....  does it line up with the vin???

 I'm no expert on these thats for sure...  Thanks again

RamAirDave

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 334
    • View Profile
    • TheMuscleCarGuys.com
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2008, 02:00:38 AM »
I'd say the VIN is okay for that tag date.

...But the tag is fake.
"Build them how the designers and engineers envisioned them to be"

www.TheMuscleCarGuys.com

Jerry@CHP

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1512
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2008, 04:03:00 AM »
Yes, this is a fake tag for sure,

Jerry

Iluv69s

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 84
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2008, 10:16:25 AM »
I must be getting better at this...I thought it looked bogus...and the rivets were the first giveaway...ita amazing because the owner is supposed to show me the original vin stamped DZ block and trans this week...I guess maybe its a real car that somone changed the tag back in the day?? I really dont believe the current owner of the car has a a clue about fake trim tags...

well, if nothing else. heres one for the database of 'bogus' cars.... Did they even have x-codes at this period of time?   Thanks again CRG!!

tom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1146
    • View Profile
    • Discount Internet Services
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2008, 12:08:53 PM »
When you go to see the block and trans try to get pictures.

Tom
69 X11 Z21 L14 glide
looking for a 69 export model (KPH) speed
o

Iluv69s

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 84
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2008, 05:32:28 PM »
sure will try to take some pics...the owner wasnt so keen on takin pics, but he did not protest when i insisted...I think he is more paranoid about getting ripped off tahn anything...apparently he has a rather large collection of parts too, so I really dont blame him......but Ill see what i can do...

  Thanks again guys...

ko-lek-tor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1858
  • someday I'll get one finished
    • View Profile
Bentley to friends :1969 SS/RS 396 owned 79
1969 SS 350 (sold)
1969 D.H.COPO replica 4spd. owned since 85
1967 302 4 spd 5.13

z28z11

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1853
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #9 on: October 27, 2013, 04:12:49 PM »
Biggest brass cujones I have read about lately - man oh man, that's brazen. People apparently don't think about e-files and memories.
Same guy, or different owner ?

Regards,
Steve
1968 Z28 M21/U17 BRG/W 1967 Chevy ll Nova SS 
1969 Z28 X77/M20/VE3 LeMans/W
1969 L78 X66/N66 Cortez/BVT
1969 Z11 L48/M35/C60/C06  1949 3100 5wd 235/6

cook_dw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3981
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #10 on: October 27, 2013, 06:19:44 PM »
Yeah that is pretty bad...  What is this world coming to...  Sad.. :(

Mike S

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2664
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #11 on: October 27, 2013, 09:20:46 PM »
 That is not the same tag from the old thread to the new one. The numbers stamped are but the tag isn't.

Mike
67 04B LOS SS/RS L35 Hardtop - Original w/UOIT
67 05B NOR SS/RS L35 Convertible - Restored

MyRed67

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 805
  • SZZLN 67
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #12 on: October 28, 2013, 12:17:34 AM »
That is not the same tag from the old thread to the new one. The numbers stamped are but the tag isn't.

Mike
Agreed, doesn't look to be the same tag.  Am I correct, the car should have a Black Vinyl top?  Sure doesn't show any signs.  And I didn't see any of the trim in the spare parts.
1967 Camaro  LOS  11A
Original Engine   Z - Tribute
Mike C.    NW - Illinois

z28z11

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1853
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #13 on: October 28, 2013, 02:52:42 AM »
That is not the same tag from the old thread to the new one. The numbers stamped are but the tag isn't.

Mike

I agree it's not the same tag - that's the point. If this is the same owner as the car in the 2008 thread (that's why I asked if it was), it's obvious he had a new X77 tag made using the X55 tag info - maybe because he had a 386 block to go with the car originally, which would work with a 12B X77. Shame on him for a flagrant foul here - 
1968 Z28 M21/U17 BRG/W 1967 Chevy ll Nova SS 
1969 Z28 X77/M20/VE3 LeMans/W
1969 L78 X66/N66 Cortez/BVT
1969 Z11 L48/M35/C60/C06  1949 3100 5wd 235/6

dannystarr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1745
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #14 on: October 28, 2013, 04:16:03 AM »
In contact with the NEW owner. He just bought it 2 months ago. So no, it's not the same guy. Get this, in the bin of parts he got the X77 tag. More to come.. Danny