100K 69 Z/28 code 52

[6667ss138]

I thought of you Bullitt (Austin) when I saw this one. Not sure its 100K nice but I will admit it sure looks good!!
I see a few things wrong and for that money and I would have liked to seen documentation. But they sure make it look good in those pictures.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Chevrolet-Camaro-Z28-Hardtop-2-Door-1969-Chevrolet-Camaro-Z28-Hardtop-2-Door-302ci-/161319960652?forcerrptr=true&hash=item258f6b404c&item=161319960652&pt=US_Cars_Trucks

[Mark]

Is this one of the things you saw?



Something odd, its definately been off the car, but I don't have my tag files at work to compare this to, but I'm leaning towards it being a repro tag.  It is a sweet looking car though.

Not originally a gauge car, since it doesn't have a clock in the center of the dash.

[firstgenaddict]

Yes Mark something does look off there...

100k no smog or manifolds that'll run $2000 ouch! I saw the Tail light lenses (x77 didn't have vertical stainless trim), however the correct ones are not reproduced. Reproduction interiors just look too plastic to me.
Really a very nicely done car if the numbers checked out as legit...

I've not too big on red cars since I was a teenager but I do like Garnet red when it looks like that one!

[x77-69z28]

Nicely presented, but no stampings shown, I don't like the tag, the rear with a December assembly date? I think mine is a week before production. You would think for 100k, you would get the right shift handle, not one out of a peterbilt! A lot of correcting to do with a hefty price tag!

[cook_dw]

Looks like a repo tag to me...  But would like a better straight on photo.

[6667ss138]

Is this one of the things you saw?



Something odd, its definately been off the car, but I don't have my tag files at work to compare this to, but I'm leaning towards it being a repro tag.  It is a sweet looking car though.

Not originally a gauge car, since it doesn't have a clock in the center of the dash.

But it has the T3 headlights with even a close up pic. Surely everything is legit.
Yeah, I noticed that the rivets had been messed with for sure.
They are getting smarter and not posting any VIN numbers.

[BillOhio]

Its about 4500 body numbers ahead of my car built same week

[HawkX66]

Edited original post for a little lysdexia... Mine is an 08D and is body number 106672. That about sums it up...

[6667ss138]

Mark, I'm just curious. After checking further did you decide if your suspicions were right and this one has a repop tag?

[HawkX66]

Mark, I'm just curious. After checking further did you decide if your suspicions were right and this one has a repop tag?

Only 243,085 69 Camaros were built. What body number is this one?...

[KurtS]

I think it's a repro.

NOR289984

[HawkX66]

I keep forgetting that the body numbers were reset to 100,000 in August.... so my posts were irrelevant. Disregard...

[Mark]

It is not consistent with other tags of the same week, I have a bunch of tags from the same timeframe as this one and they don't have the same characters style on several of the numbers.  So yes I would say it is a repro.  The body number is also probably the original number though.  No telling what the car was originally now, was it just a color change on a Z, or was it a base 307 coupe.

[firstgenaddict]

It is not consistent with other tags of the same week, I have a bunch of tags from the same timeframe as this one and they don't have the same characters style on several of the numbers.  So yes I would say it is a repro.  The body number is also probably the original number though.  No telling what the car was originally now, was it just a color change on a Z, or was it a base 307 coupe.

X2 I came to the exact same conclusion...bad characters but body num was prob original.

[BULLITT65]

Sorry, we have been moving into a new house so I am just now getting back up to speed. Nice pics but I also noticed the tail lights, exhaust tips look funny to me? I know its a fresh resto but sits a bit to high for me. I also noticed there wasn't a clock. So along with the trim tag, to me there is to many questionable items  , to think the rest of the car is legit. Documentation would be the key for a lot of it.
I do like the Garnet Red paint, but there may be a bit of photoshop used for the reflective properties in those pics. 

thanks for posting, I didn't see it on ebay.