Caveat Emptor...tag messed with?

[william]

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1969-Chevrolet-Camaro-Z-28/153894135322?hash=item23d4ce261a:g:suEAAOSwYNpekQ3m&vxp=mtr

124379N683848

Are ya kiddin' me?

[adjudimo]

I am in no way versed in some of the things a few of you are, But; what a JOKE! Maybe the kindergarden class did this one during art class.

[z28z11]

I think it's an original tag; whether it's original to this car is a good question. Maybe if you took about a 1/2" of roofing tar off of the tag, you might be able to see it better. I agree with William - it's been off, or replaced, or changed to be sure. No doubt - and a shame to spend this much money on a restoration, and then goof the tag up.

Regards,
Steve

[KurtS]

I truly can't pass judgement on that tag, really hard to tell what you are seeing....

[adjudimo]

At first I thought it looked like the number and letters had been altered, but looking at it again for a longer period of time and a magnifying glass, it actually looks more like it has multiple coats of paint obscuring and blending them all together. My previous remark was premature.

[Danzo]

This cars VIN is in the documentation list in the 1969 Orphan section.
Doc.

[KurtS]

Doc,
Good catch. An other invoice for the car was on ebay 9 years ago. It was handwritten, but has the same info as the typed invoice. At the time, the car was said to survive.

[william]

'Paperwork' has several incorrect option prices.

[Danzo]

Here some more info

[Danzo]

More
Rearend is one day off P-O-P

[Z282NV]

Back on the market again, now $10 K less than in April. Maybe they looked at this thread?

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1969-Chevrolet-Camaro-Z-28/153994641473?hash=item23dacbc041:g:suEAAOSwYNpekQ3m