News:

Classified ads are not allowed on the forum.

Main Menu

Recent posts

#21
Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 Pace car on BAT
Last post by FRANKTHECRANK - October 15, 2026, 07:20:56 AM
The car looks pretty nice to me. The fact the VIN and data tag have been removed isn't a deal breaker if done so to restore the panels they are riveted to and weren't part of a rebody resto. Proof of the hidden VINs would be needed to confirm those two tags indeed belong to the car, and the POP matching that VIN is really the most valuable documentation to have after verifying the VIN does belong to that car.
#22
Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 Pace car on BAT
Last post by KevinW - October 15, 2026, 07:16:06 AM
Small block crossmember :)
#23
Originality / 4053 fuel bowls
Last post by x66 714 - October 14, 2026, 08:54:43 PM
The front fuel bowl was warped on my 4053 so I used one from a 780 I had laying around. My question is: is there a special casting number I should be looking for to keep it more on the original side? The carb is a 1969 if that matters. Thank you, Joe
#24
Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 Pace car on BAT
Last post by william - October 14, 2026, 08:18:47 PM
Originally an L48. Window sticker and shipper's copy are repros.

Be aware both VIN and body tags have been removed and reinstalled.
#25
Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 Pace car on BAT
Last post by BillOhio - October 14, 2026, 08:16:32 PM
I see several things I dont like.  It will be interesting how it comes out.  Looks like tag has been off and dash replaced to start with
#26
Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 Pace car on BAT
Last post by Badshifter - October 14, 2026, 07:14:33 PM
I think it will get called out shortly. Nice looking car though.
#27
Decoding/Numbers / 1969 Pace car on BAT
Last post by Danzo - October 14, 2026, 07:03:27 PM
124679N612536
Interesting paperwork among other things
Doc
https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1969-chevrolet-camaro-ss-139/
#28
Site Comments/Discussion / Re: Not Secure
Last post by 77thor - October 14, 2026, 03:03:15 PM
Yup, no message today.
#29
Site Comments/Discussion / Re: Not Secure
Last post by rocco376 - October 14, 2026, 08:00:32 AM
Looks to be fixed now.
#30
Site Comments/Discussion / Re: Not Secure
Last post by buenymayor - October 14, 2026, 01:07:59 AM
Yeah, I've been getting that error for a couple days as well. Thanks for working on it, Bryon.