Lawrence,
35 69 looks better. Else I'd say your tank has been replaced.
Steve,
Nice to see some late data! Not a huge surprise since it was almost a 1970 model, but I wasn't sure which way they would have done it.
12D 68 20
02C 68 27
05D 68 44
07D 68 52
07D 68 53
09B 1 69
10A 6 69
10D 10 69
12A 16 69
01B 21 69
01C 22 69
02D 28 69
02D 29 69
02D 29 69
03D 45 69 - replaced?
04C 37 69
04C 37 69
05A 37 69
05E 41 69
06A 42 69
10A 9 70