CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 22, 2014, 12:56:59 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103337 Posts in 12156 Topics by 4691 Members
Latest Member: 67Nick
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  General Discussion
| | |-+  1968 Z-28
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2  All Print
Author Topic: 1968 Z-28  (Read 9410 times)
garve
Newbie
*
Posts: 12


View Profile
« on: January 19, 2006, 11:38:26 AM »

I am considering purchasing a 1968 Z-28. I have watched the car sit for many years and have finally talked the owner into considering selling it. Can anyone tell me how many Z-28's were produced in 1968. In looking at the Old Cars Price Guide from Dec. '05 it would appear that the Z-28 is of more value than other models even though it has less HP? Is this because there were less of them?

Thanks,

Garve
Logged
3Zs
Member
***
Posts: 40


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2006, 01:23:54 PM »

There were only 28,103 Z/28s produced in all three years of the First Generation: 602 in '67, 7199 in '68 and 20,302 in '69.  Quite rare relative to total Camaro production!
Logged
garve
Newbie
*
Posts: 12


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2006, 05:28:34 PM »

Can I verify from the VIN that this is in fact a Z-28?
Logged
enio45
Member
***
Posts: 94


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2006, 05:43:04 PM »

No not from the cowl tag....u need the protecto plate to validate the MO motor to start. 
Logged

Eddie  Montini
69Z
garve
Newbie
*
Posts: 12


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2006, 05:58:04 PM »

Well, I have learned that that is correct. However, I have also learned that the original 302 was replaced with a 327. They apparently did use the heads and intake from the 302. The 4-speed transmission and 12 Bolt rearend are believed to be original. I have learned that a local individual who I just spoke with purchased the car used from our local dealer in 1971. He them sold it to the last owner in 1974. I purchased the car today. According to this person the car was indeed a Z-28 and had 12,000 miles on it and was like new when he got it. Being from a small town (pop. 8500) I am inclined to believe that this is in fact a Z-28. This will be my first Camaro restoration and I am sure that this will prove to be a valuable site. Thanks for any input and I hope I am not crazy for purchasing this car!
Logged
lakeholme
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2143


*68-12D L30/M35*


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: January 19, 2006, 07:50:15 PM »

I know the small block matched up, but wouldn't you like to know why they put in a 327 and not another 302?!?
If you like the car (and paid a fair price) then you are not crazy.  When you drive down the road on a sunny day and everyone gives you a second look, you'll at least know there are a lot of folks who love a Camaro --Z, matching #s, or not!
Good luck on the restoration... Happy motoring!
 Grin Grin Grin
« Last Edit: January 19, 2006, 08:11:04 PM by lakeholme » Logged

Phillip
HNR-AACA, Senior Master
Planning 2016 Sentimental Tour, AACA (and restoring a 40 Buick Special for it)
AACA Southeastern Division Spring Meet Chair
"Charlotte AutoFair, presented by the Hornets Nest Region, AACA, is the largest and greatest Collector Vehicle Event in the Southeast USA."
garve
Newbie
*
Posts: 12


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2006, 08:23:31 AM »

I would like to know why a 327 instead of another 302. The change was done in 1975 and I think they had no idea what they had. At the risk of sounding completely clueless(which at this point I admittedly am) what are the chances of finding another 302??
Logged
JohnZ
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 4067


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2006, 11:15:23 AM »

It probably got a 327 as a replacement because they were very common, inexpensive, and plentiful (millions of them were made). "Real" '68 302's are difficult to find, although thousands have been "created"; there's nothing special about the block, but the 3"-stroke large-journal cranks are hard to find.
Logged

'69 Z/28
Fathom Green
CRG
maroman
Member
***
Posts: 345


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: January 24, 2006, 07:04:51 AM »

Garve, good find. Do some research you will be able to prove to yourself that it is indeed a Z-28. First look at the tire pressure decal in the glove box. If the tire size is E70X15 inch, you on your way. Does it have ralley wheels, the ones on Zs were unique. Check the date code on them.You'll find  your proof.
Logged

Doug  '67 RS/SS 396 auto I know the car since new
KevinW
Member
***
Posts: 406


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: January 24, 2006, 08:29:44 AM »

Garve, are you determining the 327 from the block casting number or the stamped deck numbers?  if the block got wiped, it is possible to just swap the crank and internals from the 302 to the 327.  Actually the casting for the 327 and the 302 are the same one.  gotta buy the car and open the engine to make sure.
Logged
Dusk Blue Z
Member
***
Posts: 82


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: January 24, 2006, 06:57:46 PM »

I think 67 and 68 302's used the small journal crank, 69 is the only year of the large journal. If your current block is a small journal block, find a 283 crank and a set of pistons and your back in business. I was told long ago that all 283 cranks were forged and I have never seen a cast one. Back in the old days you could pick up an extra 25 cu in. pretty quick and many did.

Mike
Logged
JohnZ
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 4067


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: January 24, 2006, 07:27:05 PM »

'67 was small-journal, '68-'69 were large-journal.  Smiley
Logged

'69 Z/28
Fathom Green
CRG
garve
Newbie
*
Posts: 12


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: January 25, 2006, 07:16:07 PM »

I finally got the car to my shop and had a good look at it. The tire pressure decal does indeed indicate E70X15. There was one wheel that I was told was the original in the trunk but I could not find any casting on it. I have simply based that it is a 327 by what I was told from the previous owner. However, I may have located the original 302 block. The owner is checking the casting #'s and I should know in a couple of days. After looking closer at the car I am even more excited. It has the front disk brakes, the large rear bumper caps, all the original trim except for whatever was on the rocker panels is in very good shape. It doesn't appear that this car has ever sustained any major body damage. Every corner and bumper is straight! I can't wait to get started! Unfortunately work seems to interfere with progress.
Logged
enio45
Member
***
Posts: 94


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: January 27, 2006, 04:31:35 AM »

Send pics!!!
Logged

Eddie  Montini
69Z
Dusk Blue Z
Member
***
Posts: 82


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: January 27, 2006, 11:39:09 AM »

Thanks for the correct information John, I used to know that.  Undecided  So much for the cheap crankshaft...

Good luck on your purchase, now the fun begins.

Mike
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.093 seconds with 18 queries.