CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 16, 2014, 08:27:13 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
104462 Posts in 12231 Topics by 4716 Members
Latest Member: Hgtech
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  Decoding/Numbers
| | |-+  Cowl Tag Authenticity?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2  All Print
Author Topic: Cowl Tag Authenticity?  (Read 5847 times)
1968RSZ28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4711



View Profile
« on: October 22, 2007, 12:48:06 AM »

CRG -

Is this cowl tag original?

Paul
Logged
1968RSZ28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4711



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2007, 12:50:14 AM »

Here's another photo...

Paul
Logged
1968RSZ28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4711



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2007, 02:31:30 AM »

More info:

- VIN: 124379L512979.  Anything in the database on this one?

- Engine assembly date:  1209

- Transmission asssembly code:  P9R23A

Does anybody see any problems with these numbers/dates?  Thanks in advance.    Smiley

Paul 

Logged
tom
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1133


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: October 22, 2007, 05:22:05 AM »

I'm not real comfortable with this tag. E-mail me if you want more info.
Others will chime in.

Tom@WWWorkz.com
Logged

69 X11 Z21 L14 glide
looking for a 69 export model (KPH) speedo
68lowered
Newbie
*
Posts: 9



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: October 22, 2007, 06:38:39 AM »

The tag looks original to me. It's an ordinary vehicle (not an X22, X33, X77) and those are the ones that seem to come up as fakes. I've never noticed the 'V' in the first line, but I tend to look more at 68 tags.
Logged

68 Midnight Blue/White top
Frame off rebuild in progress
327/4sp/3.73
Ed Ernst
Member
***
Posts: 62



View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: October 22, 2007, 07:12:00 AM »

IMO - That's a real Van Nuys tag.  Should be a 1 under that rivet to make it a 12B car. Nice color/interior combo.
Logged

1967 SS/RS convertible  --  1969 9561 X11 RS
KurtS
CRG Coordinator
*****
Posts: 3202


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: October 22, 2007, 10:04:29 AM »

Tag looks OK, IMO.
Trans looks a little early, but very possible.

Do the engine and trans have VIN stamps? Any pics of the any of the engine/trans stamps?
Logged

Kurt S
CRG
1968RSZ28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4711



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 22, 2007, 11:24:33 AM »

Thanks Tom, "68lowered", Ed, and Kurt!

Tag looks OK, IMO.
Trans looks a little early, but very possible.

Do the engine and trans have VIN stamps? Any pics of the any of the engine/trans stamps?

Yes, the engine and transmission are VIN stamped.  The transmission assembly code may not be accurate, it's based on my best guess from this photo:  http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v516/scalia/P1010144.jpg

Here's a photo of the engine assembly code:  http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v516/scalia/P1010122.jpg

And a photo of the partial VIN stamped on the engine pad:  http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v516/scalia/P1010121.jpg

These are the seller's photos.  So, are the stampings original?  Thanks again...

Paul
Logged
Jonesy
Member
***
Posts: 322


1967 z/28 project


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: October 22, 2007, 04:00:06 PM »

That tag is fine. Not sure about the stampings on the trans, too hard to see. The Block stamping is questionable IMO. Would like to see the pad without paint. The VIN stamping is questionable IMO.
Logged

1967 RS-Z/28 Nantucket Blue the D-2 car

http://s191.photobucket.com/albums/z279/jones93_photos/
Ed Ernst
Member
***
Posts: 62



View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: October 22, 2007, 04:41:48 PM »

I can't comment on the trans.  IMO - The block stamp looks good.  The VIN ...hmm, I would lean towards questionable, also (but I haven't seen any stamps from this build period).  I, too, would like see it without all the paint and would like a better pic of the trans,  Attached is a couple of pics of my former 02A  LA built Z (man, I miss that car Cry )
Logged

1967 SS/RS convertible  --  1969 9561 X11 RS
KurtS
CRG Coordinator
*****
Posts: 3202


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: October 22, 2007, 08:24:33 PM »

I can't make a call with those pics, but they tend to look OK.
Logged

Kurt S
CRG
1968RSZ28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4711



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: October 23, 2007, 12:34:33 AM »

Thanks Mike, Ed (great photos!), and Kurt for your expertise and opinions.  I'd hope to inspect the vehicle myself this morning, but couldn't get away from work before the vehicle sold:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=280162505676&ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:IT&ih=018

Check out the exhaust manifolds!    Huh

Paul     

Logged
tom
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1133


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #12 on: October 23, 2007, 05:40:05 AM »

Was there a difference between LA tags and Norwood tags?

Tom
Logged

69 X11 Z21 L14 glide
looking for a 69 export model (KPH) speedo
68lowered
Newbie
*
Posts: 9



View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: October 23, 2007, 06:32:34 AM »

Nice looking car & everything looks correct. The only somewhat suspicious thing is the fresh paint on the block where the engine doesn't look like its been out for quite a while.....
Logged

68 Midnight Blue/White top
Frame off rebuild in progress
327/4sp/3.73
1968RSZ28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4711



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: October 23, 2007, 10:52:43 AM »

Was there a difference between LA tags and Norwood tags?

Yes, there is a difference Tom.  Read this for all the details:  http://www.camaros.org/numbers.shtml#CowlTag

Paul
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.326 seconds with 18 queries.