Author Topic: 1969 Z-28  (Read 3400 times)

MFortie

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
    • View Profile
1969 Z-28
« on: January 27, 2019, 01:42:31 PM »
Wonder what the general consensus is on this car:

https://providence.craigslist.org/cto/d/southbridge-1969-camaro-28/6799880652.html

Thanks,

Mark

77thor

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 329
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 Z-28
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2019, 02:59:30 PM »
Hmmmm… the trim tag looks suspect to me. Let the experts chime in.
1969 Camaro SS, 350(NOM), M21, 12 Bolt Posi, 01B LOS Build
1977 Camaro, 350(LM1), M20, 10 Bolt Posi, Purchased New, (SOLD)

z28z11

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1853
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 Z-28
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2019, 04:22:44 PM »
I think the tag is genuine, the VIN on this car places it within a very few of my Z11, which is an 03D car as well. Be pretty tough to find a loose tag within this time frame (I guess it's possible, but unlikely). If we knew the rest of the VIN and body sequence it would be a bit more verifiable, but it's a fairly high chance of being legit. JMO -

Regards,
Steve
1968 Z28 M21/U17 BRG/W 1967 Chevy ll Nova SS 
1969 Z28 X77/M20/VE3 LeMans/W
1969 L78 X66/N66 Cortez/BVT
1969 Z11 L48/M35/C60/C06  1949 3100 5wd 235/6

BillOhio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1179
    • View Profile
    • photobucket
Re: 1969 Z-28
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2019, 05:12:46 PM »
Theres been a bunch of discussion on this car on the yenko site. I will see if I can find it. That car has been all over craigslist. I am in florida and it shows up down here. https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=151990
Only thing I remembered was it was originally advertized as original paint and you could see a paint line on the cowl.  The paint claim seems to be gone now.  Interesting car
1969 Z28, Burgandy, numbers matching, 12,900 miles
1968 RS 327 4 speed
1970 Z28 M22 4:10 bought from original owner
1961 Chrysler 300G convertible

Spooky

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 90
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 Z-28
« Reply #4 on: January 27, 2019, 07:09:43 PM »
the vin is 124379N620470

Tag looks like 12437 NOR291998

firstgenaddict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2882
  • caretaker of 1971 LT1's 11130 & 21783
    • View Profile
    • Groome Family Automobiles
Re: 1969 Z-28
« Reply #5 on: January 27, 2019, 11:19:33 PM »
What a rare color combo...Silver Grille would do wonders for the car.
IMHO I think it would look better without the Vtop or with a white vtop & white stripes

James
Collectin' Camaro's since "Only Rednecks drove them"
Current caretaker of 1971 LT1's - 11130 and 21783 Check out the Black 69 RS/Z28 45k mile Survivor and the Lemans Blue 69 Z 10D frame off...
https://plus.google.com/photos/112392262205377424364/albums?banner=pwa

BULLITT65

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4476
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 Z-28
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2019, 02:59:09 AM »
I inquired about this car for friend. It has had some full quarter work done on it that likely needs to be redone. The rest of the car looked decent though (less the mirror) :)
1969 garnet red Z/28 46k mile unrestored X77
-Looking for 3192477 (front) spiral shocks 3192851 (rear)
-Looking for an original LOF soft ray windshield
-Looking for original Delco side post negative battery cable part # 6297651AV

cook_dw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3981
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 Z-28
« Reply #7 on: January 28, 2019, 06:50:58 PM »
I think the tag is genuine, the VIN on this car places it within a very few of my Z11, which is an 03D car as well. Be pretty tough to find a loose tag within this time frame (I guess it's possible, but unlikely). If we knew the rest of the VIN and body sequence it would be a bit more verifiable, but it's a fairly high chance of being legit. JMO -

Regards,
Steve
 
Yep tag is legit.  Pad, alt and docs all appear legit as well.

BULLITT65

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4476
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 Z-28
« Reply #8 on: January 28, 2019, 07:52:07 PM »
Sorry not full quarter work done, wheel well work. Here are the pics when they went to flare the rear fender wells

I think the rear openings still have the flare, and need to be repaired, but hard to see it in the one pic. The last time he listed it there was a pic of the rear of the car, and you could see they were flared.
1969 garnet red Z/28 46k mile unrestored X77
-Looking for 3192477 (front) spiral shocks 3192851 (rear)
-Looking for an original LOF soft ray windshield
-Looking for original Delco side post negative battery cable part # 6297651AV