Bob, a few observations if I may.
1. The rear axle is dated April 15th, but we need to know the casting date on the pumpkin. However, an axle dated 6 months before the car was built means it's probably not original. Yes, we HAVE seen anomalies to the "6 month rule", but not on a common 3.07 ratio.
2. The trim tag has the wrong rivets, so it's been off the car. It may have been removed when the car was restored because it appears to be real, but just an FYI.
3. The transmission probably isn't original. It's got a 1968 date (P8P16 - assembled September 16th, 1967 for use in a 1968 passenger car) instead of a 1969 date.
4. The engine suffix appears to be original, but you would need to post a picture of the pad with the paint removed to make sure. Use paint remover and NOT a screwdriver or scraper to remove the paint!!
5. Related to the suffix, the VIN stamp on the engine is too difficult to make out. Can you get a better picture of that?
Oh, and welcome to the site! If you got the car for the $24.5k that I'm seeing on Google, you got a great deal. Of course, that was back in 2012, so that's probably not what you paid since you said you just got it last year.
Ed