CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 23, 2014, 03:46:17 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106496 Posts in 12421 Topics by 4787 Members
Latest Member: Oilron14
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  Mild Modifications
| | |-+  Cross Ram Z in action - sorta - check er out
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2  All Print
Author Topic: Cross Ram Z in action - sorta - check er out  (Read 5292 times)
aaronz28
Member
***
Posts: 95


View Profile Email
« on: October 08, 2013, 09:33:10 PM »

finished my Crossram Conversion -

LOVE IT - very driveable and after a few thousand miles, plugs still look new Cheesy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGkwsho-zbA&list=UUzOqCQc0JKM43SLQ6d-Nn-Q
Logged
1968RSZ28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4819



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2013, 09:39:11 PM »

Bad as hell!!  Nice job, Aaron!

Paul
Logged
BillOhio
Member
***
Posts: 380



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2013, 11:00:49 PM »

Very nice. What gears are in the car?
Guitar sounds good too!
Logged

1969 Z28, Burgandy, numbers matching, 12,900 miles
1967 Plymouth GTX Hemi, 4 speed, dana
1961 Chrysler 300G convertible
hgger69
Member
***
Posts: 204


Hugger orange rules!


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2013, 01:30:08 AM »

Looks fantastic and I really love that aggressive sound!  Cool
...wonder what it would take to make my 355 sound like that.....  Smiley
Logged

Regards

Hakan from Sweden
1969 Camaro X44, hugger orange, 355, TH350, 4:10 12 bolt Posi, RPO Z87, black/white houndstooth, 14" steel wheels & dog dish, 02D built
www.hakansmotorsida.com
aaronz28
Member
***
Posts: 95


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: October 09, 2013, 07:02:37 AM »

thanks -  i have it geared with wide ratio M22 auto gearset (2.54 1st) and 4.56 - so it certainly has the benefit of torque multiplication for sure. and it has a 10# flywheel.

I like it idling at 1000 rpm, which is probably a tad low -  but rollig out of a stop at 12-1400 is easier than the 30/30 was with 11 to 1. (same gears)

honestly, i can't make full use of this cars power - if you nail the throttle, the tires comes loose at any speed above 3000 rpm.   The last time I had it out, i thought i'd wind it up on a freeway entrance ramp.... i eased into it in 1st, and then when it hit 5500 in 2nd, it started floating out on me....

needs more rubber Cheesy
Logged
BillOhio
Member
***
Posts: 380



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2013, 08:59:58 AM »

My car had the 140 cam since about 1970, guy installed it and springs with aluminum retainers. Retainers were prone to cracking so its a wonder I have original engine. My car had 4.88s but just took them out. Not much fun on freeway. Mine likes 1000 also. I would think your compression would be a big help.
Hakan, Anymore they have decided that nasty idle isn't needed to make horsepower. I had a 383 built with dart products parts and it has a somewhat small roller in it. My 472 hemi has a small roller in it and its making right at 600 horse at 6000 rpm. Just over 10:1 in pump gas. It idles about 900 and is very calm. I have a dyno and exhaust sound video on You tube under bill foos if you want to hear it. Rollers are great with the oil we have now too
Logged

1969 Z28, Burgandy, numbers matching, 12,900 miles
1967 Plymouth GTX Hemi, 4 speed, dana
1961 Chrysler 300G convertible
doomer
Member
***
Posts: 45



View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: October 15, 2013, 12:19:06 PM »

Sweet. That's not the $25k NOS crossram setup from HeartbleatCity was it? lol
Logged
aaronz28
Member
***
Posts: 95


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: October 15, 2013, 12:39:19 PM »

god no - its actually a repop manifold -  when i was making the video, i said NOS parts - but didn't intend to mislead -  however the carbs are new production holley, and the manifold is the a repop with port matched intake etc.

thanks
Logged
janobyte
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 760


1968 z/28

bajcer@msn.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: October 15, 2013, 02:26:45 PM »

Very well done !
Logged
aaronz28
Member
***
Posts: 95


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: October 15, 2013, 02:27:46 PM »

thanks!
Logged
BULLITT65
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1522


BULLITT65
View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: October 19, 2013, 01:03:43 AM »

So if you don't mind telling us what did the repop set up run from start to finish? (the intake and up)
Logged

1969 garnet red Z/28 46k mile unrestored X77
Looking for 3192477 (front) spiral shocks 3192851 (rear) please
Looking for an original LOF soft ray windshield
Looking for original Delco side post negative battery cable part # 6297651AV
BillOhio
Member
***
Posts: 380



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #11 on: October 20, 2013, 09:46:28 AM »

The ones I heard fit nice, an ebayer Reesmooth has.3300 and needs gaskets and linkages. Throttle cable. Would be fun to play with and what eye appeal. 
Logged

1969 Z28, Burgandy, numbers matching, 12,900 miles
1967 Plymouth GTX Hemi, 4 speed, dana
1961 Chrysler 300G convertible
BULLITT65
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1522


BULLITT65
View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: October 20, 2013, 11:01:10 AM »

The eye appeal is the main incentive that I see for installing one. From all the original articles I have read it sounds like the x ram was not street friendly, and it was hard to take advantage of the cam and x ram setup. I have a god article from Car Life ( August of 69), where they tested both and came away with the opinion that the x ram had a coolness factor to it, bt performance wise the stock 4 barrel would beat it in nearly every instance.
I would love to drive one just to se the difference Shocked
Logged

1969 garnet red Z/28 46k mile unrestored X77
Looking for 3192477 (front) spiral shocks 3192851 (rear) please
Looking for an original LOF soft ray windshield
Looking for original Delco side post negative battery cable part # 6297651AV
JKZ27
Member
***
Posts: 257



View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: October 23, 2013, 02:37:24 PM »

Coolness no doubt! But, the crossram had to make a positive difference on the track at least, don't you think? From my SCCA days, if it didn't make the car faster it was worthless. Nobody gave a crap about coolness. Cool I can't imagine all that engineering, set-up, and added weight only to be out performed by a single 4. I've heard it many times that a single 4bbl will perform better than a 2x4bbl in most cases and I believe that to be true for the street but, with the right combination and tuning, that crossram HAS to do something more...Curious.

John
Logged

69 RS/SS Cortez Silver, L48 MC1
68 RS Ash/Ivy Gold 327EFI M20
79 Z28 Brown LM1 M21
04 SRT 10
BULLITT65
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1522


BULLITT65
View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: October 23, 2013, 03:32:49 PM »

I believe what they were alluding to in the article was if you were at the track and in that high rpm band most of time then you would benefit from the x ram. On the street/strip the  780 was the way to go.
Logged

1969 garnet red Z/28 46k mile unrestored X77
Looking for 3192477 (front) spiral shocks 3192851 (rear) please
Looking for an original LOF soft ray windshield
Looking for original Delco side post negative battery cable part # 6297651AV
Pages: [1] 2  All Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.074 seconds with 18 queries.