CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 24, 2014, 05:54:33 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106551 Posts in 12423 Topics by 4788 Members
Latest Member: capt68
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  Originality
| | |-+  3352 block
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: 3352 block  (Read 1962 times)
dab67
Member
***
Posts: 460


67 SS


View Profile
« on: September 05, 2006, 08:20:42 AM »

OK CRG I need some guidance!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This past weekend I was at a car show and was talking to a few fellow Camaro owners. One had a "3352" block for sale that came out of his "67 Camaro. The casting date according to this person is B 8 or 9 ( can't remember for sure) of 67.  My cars build date is the first week of April in '67. He stated it was a 350 but did not have numbers off the front pad. He said these were eliminated when he had it decked a few years back and then decided to drop a 383 Crate into his Camaro instead of using the block. Anyways, the price is good, includes the crank and pistons. Has anyone ever seen a 3352 block in a '67 other than a 327?? I know CRG states that the 3352 was available for the SS350 but all I have ever seen or have ever heard discussed was the 2657 block. If I were to purchase this engine, would it be considered a numbers matching for my car?  Huh Huh

Thanks
dab67
Logged
KurtS
CRG Coordinator
*****
Posts: 3293


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2006, 12:50:35 AM »

We have not documented a 3352 block in an L48. Not to say it didn't happen.

Since it's not original (and decked), I wouldn't sweat it as long as the internals are correct.
Logged

Kurt S
CRG
dab67
Member
***
Posts: 460


67 SS


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2006, 06:03:02 AM »

Kurt:

Thanks for the reply. Even though it still isn't original if I am going to attempt to make my car a numbers matching I want to do it correctly. I am still leary of the fact no "3352" has not been documented.

dab67
Logged
dab67
Member
***
Posts: 460


67 SS


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 19, 2006, 11:31:00 AM »

Welll I guess from the responses I have received regarding this matter, the opinion is moot.

dab67
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.074 seconds with 17 queries.