CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2014, 02:49:07 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97521 Posts in 11718 Topics by 4581 Members
Latest Member: Cooper48
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  Originality
| | |-+  Exhaust heat valve question.
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2  All Print
Author Topic: Exhaust heat valve question.  (Read 1633 times)
69Z28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 755


69 X33D80 Z28


View Profile
« on: July 23, 2013, 11:01:08 PM »

Is the heat valve the same for all 69 small blocks with 2" and 2 1/4" headpipes or are there two different valves? What about flanges? I don't have them and need them. Found both a valve and 2 flanges but need to make sure they will fit the factory manifolds and exhaust for a 69 DZ engine.
Logged

I'm "GaryC" from Clayton Delaware.

'UNRESTORED' 1969 Cortez Silver X33D80 Z28
69pace
Member
***
Posts: 364



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2013, 11:26:52 PM »


http://www.rickscamaros.com/1969+chevy+camaro+standard/camaro-exhaust-manifold-heat-riser-assembly-small-block-gm-1967-1974.html

This is the only one I know of for 1969 small blocks...though most of the ones I have seen were removed and an eliminator ring substituted or they just gutted and reinstalled the factory item by removing the flapper door and weights and a stove bolt inserted to close former axle pivot hole.
Logged

1969 Z-11 350/300 with 4 Speed
69Z28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 755


69 X33D80 Z28


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2013, 05:50:01 PM »

This is the heat valve I have. Looks the same doesn't it? Something is either upside down or backwards on mine I think.
Logged

I'm "GaryC" from Clayton Delaware.

'UNRESTORED' 1969 Cortez Silver X33D80 Z28
69pace
Member
***
Posts: 364



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2013, 11:20:48 AM »

Yeah the bottom picture looks right side up as the weight should be installed on the fender side, weight pointed toward the front of the vehicle. Take the top one and flip it around and see what it looks like. Both Look in good condition considering age.
Logged

1969 Z-11 350/300 with 4 Speed
69Z28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 755


69 X33D80 Z28


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 01, 2013, 12:14:07 PM »

Yeah the bottom picture looks right side up as the weight should be installed on the fender side, weight pointed toward the front of the vehicle. Take the top one and flip it around and see what it looks like. Both Look in good condition considering age.



Those 2 pics are of the same valve. Works perfect, just need to clean it up a bit. So as it sits in the second pic just rotate the valve 1/4 turn clockwise so the weight is parallel with the fender.


Is the Ricks pic wrong?
Logged

I'm "GaryC" from Clayton Delaware.

'UNRESTORED' 1969 Cortez Silver X33D80 Z28
JohnZ
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 3963


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: August 02, 2013, 11:36:31 AM »


Is the Ricks pic wrong?

Nope, it's just shown upside-down; the flat side goes up, against the (flat) outlet flange on the manifold, with a gasket, and the chamfered side goes down, and mates with the top of the "donut".
Logged

'69 Z/28
Fathom Green
CRG
69Z28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 755


69 X33D80 Z28


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 02, 2013, 11:43:29 AM »


Is the Ricks pic wrong?

Nope, it's just shown upside-down; the flat side goes up, against the (flat) outlet flange on the manifold, with a gasket, and the chamfered side goes down, and mates with the top of the "donut".


If you look at the pic of Ricks and mine the weigh mechanism is reversed or backwards or something. One of them is wrong it believe.
Logged

I'm "GaryC" from Clayton Delaware.

'UNRESTORED' 1969 Cortez Silver X33D80 Z28
rich69rs
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 864


LF7/M35/Z22/Z87


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: August 02, 2013, 11:55:23 AM »

These things are problematic at best - I have not had
a good experience with any current offerings.  For what it's
worth, my two, cents is that they will eventually stick, and
probably in the closed or partially closed position.

I removed them from both my '66 Chevelke and '69 Camaro
and replaced them with the donut replacements.

Unless you absolutely have to have it original, to me
the problems far outweigh the benefits.  Both of my
cars start easily - and I give them a few extra seconds (10-15) at
idle when I first start them, but other than that you would not
know the heat riser valves weren't installed unless you physically
went and looked.
Logged

Richard Thomas
1969 RS
69pace
Member
***
Posts: 364



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: August 02, 2013, 03:52:39 PM »

Is the Ricks pic wrong?
Nope, it's just shown upside-down; the flat side goes up, against the (flat) outlet flange on the manifold, with a gasket, and the chamfered side goes down, and mates with the top of the "donut".

If you look at the pic of Ricks and mine the weigh mechanism is reversed or backwards or something. One of them is wrong it believe.

No its the same valve - as JohnZ states there IS a top side and a bottom side of the valve.  And yes it was common practice to remove or to gut the valve, and close the hole from the removed flapper axle with a standard nut and bolt. That was what was done on my vehicle by the original owner when he removed the smog pump.
Logged

1969 Z-11 350/300 with 4 Speed
69Z28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 755


69 X33D80 Z28


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 02, 2013, 05:07:38 PM »

Maybe your not seeing what I see. On the Ricks valve pic, the bevel for the packing donut is facing up with the weight mechanism pointing, lets say north and on the right. If you look at my second pic the flat gasket side is up with the weight mechanism pointing north and to the right. If I flip mine over 180 then the weight mechanism is on the left of the valve whereas the Ricks pic is on the right...OR...if you spin my first pic 180 either way, clockwise or counter-clockwise to match the Ricks pic the weight mechanism's are opposite.

Can you see it? I'm thinking one of these is wrong.
Logged

I'm "GaryC" from Clayton Delaware.

'UNRESTORED' 1969 Cortez Silver X33D80 Z28
69pace
Member
***
Posts: 364



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: August 02, 2013, 09:38:57 PM »

No I understand what you are saying but there are many repro valves out there some are flat and chamfered as original, others are chamfered on both sides. ANd they pictures are generic-interchangeable on catalog listings.
Logged

1969 Z-11 350/300 with 4 Speed
69Z28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 755


69 X33D80 Z28


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: August 03, 2013, 02:48:49 PM »

No I understand what you are saying but there are many repro valves out there some are flat and chamfered as original, others are chamfered on both sides. ANd they pictures are generic-interchangeable on catalog listings.

OK, I think I got it now. That pic in itself is not a good representation of what an OEM heat valve would look like for a 69 Camaro Z28.

If that's the case does mine look correct? I think the guy said it was a take off of a 71 350 270hp Corvette.
Logged

I'm "GaryC" from Clayton Delaware.

'UNRESTORED' 1969 Cortez Silver X33D80 Z28
69pace
Member
***
Posts: 364



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: August 03, 2013, 09:41:09 PM »

Yes I believe that John liked your examples.
Logged

1969 Z-11 350/300 with 4 Speed
mickeystoys69RSSS
Member
***
Posts: 240



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: August 05, 2013, 07:36:43 PM »

Any way to tell if this valve is stuck? The more I think about it, I noticed that at the rear tips the exhaust flows better on the drivers side than passengers. So I am thinking mine might be stuck?
Logged
janobyte
Member
***
Posts: 466


1968 z/28

bajcer@msn.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: August 05, 2013, 08:25:40 PM »

OE from my 68 Z
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.075 seconds with 18 queries.