2851
Originality / Re: What were the original nuts used on the '69 rear spoiler
« on: July 09, 2006, 11:11:29 PM »
Norwood 04C 69 Z... 45 k miles original paint... same as JohnZ's car.
News:
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Classified ads are not allowed on the forum.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2852
General Discussion / Re: 97 camaro anniversary cars
« on: July 08, 2006, 01:59:30 AM »
They made 97 SS anniversary cars that were the white and orange Coupe and Conv. but they were not exclusive to the SS...
I know that the LT4's are extremely rare.
I know that the LT4's are extremely rare.
2853
General Discussion / Re: 1967 SS/RS L78 project forsale (The real deal, Not a clone)
« on: July 08, 2006, 01:58:01 AM »
It is a special car no matter what... but the possibility that it was either a drag car or a dealer modified car exists...
There were so few L-78's built in 67 and most ordinary people did not opt for the L78. The performance dealers or drag racers were the ones who typically would have ordered a car like that, shoulder belts as well... to keep you in the seat.
ONLY SAYING that someone should do some homework on this one, it could be worth their time.
There were so few L-78's built in 67 and most ordinary people did not opt for the L78. The performance dealers or drag racers were the ones who typically would have ordered a car like that, shoulder belts as well... to keep you in the seat.
ONLY SAYING that someone should do some homework on this one, it could be worth their time.
2854
General Discussion / Re: 1967 SS/RS L78 project forsale (The real deal, Not a clone)
« on: July 05, 2006, 08:20:08 PM »
You have to divide those 1100 cars by the number of weeks they made them... from mid march till end of production... I believe I am correct on the begining date.
2855
General Discussion / Re: Your worst 1st generation Camaro fears - realized
« on: July 04, 2006, 12:50:04 PM »
I can remember back in the late 70's when guys would clip two car and weld them together... usually a total loss from the front and one from the rear.
It was not all that uncommon.
It was not all that uncommon.
2856
General Discussion / Re: Your worst 1st generation Camaro fears - realized
« on: July 03, 2006, 01:53:51 AM »
I would have to say that it would be intent. If you are trying to salvage every possible piece of an original car possible... whether it is all but the 1/4's or whether it is only the roof structure and A pillars... then you would not be doing anything unethical. However if you were trying to take the "easy" way by drilling out a few rivets and attaching them to a new body then you would be guilty of a rebody... anyone... Bueller... anyone... JMHO
2857
Originality / Re: 67 SSRS 350 shocks?
« on: July 03, 2006, 01:44:45 AM »
When you find out let me know I just ordered a set and are putting them on a 69 Z
2858
Originality / Re: coil spring ID
« on: June 30, 2006, 07:06:44 PM »
They are in the Black 69 RS/Z that is an original paint car... just wondering
2859
Originality / coil spring ID
« on: June 30, 2006, 03:25:10 AM »
Anyone know what a 3955725 coil spring fits? Or what the rate is?
2860
Originality / Re: stripe question
« on: June 30, 2006, 01:09:17 AM »
I have some pics of an original paint 68 Z with 18k miles and it is Sequoia Green with Black Stripes and Black Int.
2861
Originality / Re: 69 Z Engine overspray
« on: June 28, 2006, 11:52:27 AM »
Thanks John Z your wealth of knowledge is so valuable to the hobby... we appreciate all of the help! 
2862
Originality / Re: Correct shifter
« on: June 25, 2006, 02:56:33 AM »
Wasn't there a problem with the muncie shifters binding up as well?
They were bolted to the crossmember or the floor or something... the hurst was bolted to the trans and even if the trans moved under heavy torque the shifter geometry stayed the same where as the Muncie geometry changed and bound if the trans twisted... seems like the problem would be negligable with a new trans mount... however if the mount got sloppy... shifting could get a little hairy,
They were bolted to the crossmember or the floor or something... the hurst was bolted to the trans and even if the trans moved under heavy torque the shifter geometry stayed the same where as the Muncie geometry changed and bound if the trans twisted... seems like the problem would be negligable with a new trans mount... however if the mount got sloppy... shifting could get a little hairy,
2863
Originality / 69 Z Engine overspray
« on: June 25, 2006, 02:47:29 AM »
What would have had overspray on it?
Were the finned aluminum valve covers on the engine when it was painted?
If so was there a small amount of overspray on the front, rear and side flanges?
The intake had a small amount of overspray front and rear... correct?
The bell housing?
The exhaust manifolds on small blocks did not have overspray like the bigblocks... right?
Were the finned aluminum valve covers on the engine when it was painted?
If so was there a small amount of overspray on the front, rear and side flanges?
The intake had a small amount of overspray front and rear... correct?
The bell housing?
The exhaust manifolds on small blocks did not have overspray like the bigblocks... right?
2864
Decoding/Numbers / Re: best way to clean up a cowl tag
« on: June 22, 2006, 05:02:45 AM »
Use enamel reducer.... it will only take off the enamel paint not the original laquer finish!!!
2865
General Discussion / Re: Delco T I ignition system
« on: June 22, 2006, 05:00:40 AM »
Please email me james@crossroadspaper.com with the price.