Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - KurtS

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 308
16
Originality / Re: A Brace of Z10's on eBay
« on: May 17, 2018, 05:04:52 AM »
Yes, both are in the database.
124379N637277 is probably NOM. The engine was 4-5 months ahead of the car w/ no VIN, now it matches....
124379N639396 - $99K for a L48?  What's that thing mounted on the subframe (last picture in the auction)?


17
General Discussion / Re: motor mounts
« on: May 17, 2018, 04:41:11 AM »
Huh? So you would run nylon toothed timing gears??

The recall was the largest ever in the auto industry and they cut corners to reduce the implementation cost. 
Interlocking was a design change that I believe was implemented in 69 (the other divisions already had interlocking). So that is a vintage design. And if you broke a mount in 69, that's what you'd get. The recall was 1972.
Airbags are kinda newer technology, not sure what you point is......

Your choices are:
run a poor design that all the other divisions chose not to use
run a poor design with a ugly bandaid so when it breaks, it doesn't bind up the throttle linkage (which is why they went to cable linkage in 70)
run a better design that noone can see anyway

18
General Discussion / Re: motor mounts
« on: May 16, 2018, 02:36:34 PM »
The recall was a cheap & ugly band-aid. They didn't want to replace all those mounts, too much money.
The interlocking mounts are superior design and the only thing I'd run in a car. Would you run a nylon tooth timing gear just to be original, even though they fail??

19
General Discussion / Re: Oil pressure at idle
« on: May 15, 2018, 02:23:55 AM »
You need to hook up an accurate gauge to see what it is actually running.
And the factory gauge is not....

20
Decoding/Numbers / Re: Caveat Emptor...another repro window sticker
« on: May 15, 2018, 02:21:24 AM »
I think the POP is a repro too. But those are really hard to tell.
Nice car, but trans, tag, WS are not original. Hey, the axle stamp is!

21
Mild Modifications / Re: NOS Engine
« on: May 14, 2018, 04:03:08 PM »
Pretty sure the letters on the pistons is for sizing.

22
Maintenance / Re: Oil
« on: May 14, 2018, 03:57:06 PM »
If you want a brand name - Shell Rotella.

23
General Discussion / Re: Any info on 124677N178719
« on: May 09, 2018, 03:38:04 AM »
I know nothing about the car.

24
General Discussion / Re: Any info on 124377N198147
« on: May 09, 2018, 03:36:33 AM »
It was on ebay in 2010. It has a repro tag.....

25
General Discussion / Re: Oil pressure at idle
« on: May 07, 2018, 05:24:39 AM »
You need to hook up an accurate gauge to see what it is actually running.

26
General Discussion / Re: 67 with wheel hop
« on: May 03, 2018, 08:03:26 PM »
If it was easy to do, they would have converted to staggered shocks mid-67.....

27
Decoding/Numbers / Re: Numbers matching or not - 3932388 block
« on: May 02, 2018, 03:46:56 AM »
WS is original.

28
The distributor was added at the vehicle assembly plant. The engine date is not a factor. 'Correct' component date codes were messed up because Chevy likely had left-over 499 inventory [and others] at other plants shipped to Norwood for the extended 1969 Camaro production run. 1969 Camaro production ended at Norwood the first week of November, 1969.
That's incorrect. The distributor was part of the engine assembly as shipped.

29
Original Cars and Details / Re: Family survivor 69 Camaro
« on: April 30, 2018, 07:46:45 PM »
Can you measure the heights and widths of the PBT stamps? I think the repros are too big, IIRC.

Thanks!

30
Decoding/Numbers / Re: Decoding tag
« on: April 30, 2018, 07:40:47 PM »
There's a google search box on the homepage (bottom right). More than handy. :)

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 308