What's wrong with this picture

[mopar346]

69 Z/28 I ran across looking at the 63 paint code car. What do you think the deal is, I see something curious.

http://nashville.craigslist.org/cto/3146101204.html

[77thor]

It looks like a 52 paint code, so I don't understand your comment.

[mopar346]

Look at the whole ad and pictures not just the data tag. There is possibly an explanation for the item out of place but it would be for a specific reason. Not being mysterious just want to see what others come up with and what I might have missed. It's all a learning process.

[DeanZ10]

I would say the door has been replaced from a champagne colored car. The odd thing is no vacuum booster for the brakes.
Trim tag looks original though or replaced decades ago. Thats all I got.

[maroman]

Wouldn't a Z have power brakes?

[1968RSZ28]

Are you referring to the power brake booster missing on a supposed Z28?

Paul

[restore-z28]

I know something about this car that is not listed in the ad...spoke to the seller some time ago as it is also listed for sale on Team Camaro. The car is a Norwood build with a LA vin number, the seller openly disclosed this info.

[1968RSZ28]

http://www.camaros.net/forums/archive/index.php/t-202804.html

Apparently, the car has drum brakes too.

Paul

[mopar346]

Booster is one issue, the is something else I think tach/gauge cluster related.

The car sounds not only eat up but completely suspect.

[mopar346]

The car has a tach and a clock, indicating that it had console gauges, I do not see the hole in the firewall for the oil pressure line. Am I looking in the wrong place? It does appear to have the muncie hole.