News:

Classified ads are not allowed on the forum.

Main Menu

VIN bona fides

Started by 67 kemie ss, November 02, 2011, 02:45:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

67 kemie ss

Anyone care to comment on whether these partial VIN stampings look correct?  I'm considering a purchase, but the differing fonts are giving me pause. They're from a 69Z.  Thanks




bertfam

Need a better picture of the engine stamp, but from what I can see, they don't appear to match. Clearer (high resolution) pictures would help.

Ed

william

Trans is probably ok; block looks odd.
Learning more and more about less and less...

KurtS

Looks like Rob's Burgundy Z. Nice car.
I'm not really liking either stamp, but that's not conclusive. What's the pad and trans stamps look like?
Kurt S
CRG

67 kemie ss

OK, thanks guys.  I don't have any greater resolution photos, or a pic of the pad stamp.  These pics were taken with my BB while squeezing myself underneath the car, and I wasn't able to get a pic of the pad without removing the alternator.   The pad is properly dated and it looked to be OK to my eye, but... 

Yes Kurt, this is a burgundy RS Z, although the current owner isn't a Rob.  I take it the VIN is in the CRG database.

OK, it's enough that there's doubt about the stamps.  I've got other complaints about the car too, so I'll pass on it.  A knowledgeable friend of mine here had question about these stamps too.  I shouldn't have second-guessed him.

KurtS

I personally find the engine stamps easier to verify.
I wouldn't call the VIN's bad until I saw the other stamps.
Kurt S
CRG

Stingr69

Transmission "0"'s are "TALLER" (less round) as compared to the engine stamping where the "0"'s are shaped more round, like a "O"

At least one, or both are restamped.

-Mark.

x77-69z28

it is my understanding that the same stamps were used, so if there are bigger "0's" on one stamp, they should be on the other stamp as well.
69 Z/28 X77 burnished brown, 711 int 05A bought in 78
70 Z28 forrest green, green int, M40, bk vinyl roof PROJECT
99 SS hugger orange 6spd NO TTOPS bought new 1 of 54
15 z/28 Arctic white, A/C 505 HP #251

JohnZ

Quote from: x77-69z28 on November 16, 2011, 12:28:53 AM
it is my understanding that the same stamps were used, so if there are bigger "0's" on one stamp, they should be on the other stamp as well.

That's not always true - I've seen stampings on known-original cars that indicate that those two stamping operations were occasionally separated. Work elements in line operations were always subject to rearrangement as content and manpower adjustments were made.
'69 Z/28
Fathom Green
CRG

x77-69z28

69 Z/28 X77 burnished brown, 711 int 05A bought in 78
70 Z28 forrest green, green int, M40, bk vinyl roof PROJECT
99 SS hugger orange 6spd NO TTOPS bought new 1 of 54
15 z/28 Arctic white, A/C 505 HP #251

firstgenaddict

I do not like the variability in the stamps either however I too have seen differences in the stamps from the engine to trans on verified cars.

The only absolute seems to be... There are no absolutes!   
James
Collectin' Camaro's since "Only Rednecks drove them"
Current caretaker of 1971 LT1's - 11130 and 21783 Check out the Black 69 RS/Z28 45k mile Survivor and the Lemans Blue 69 Z 10D frame off...
https://plus.google.com/photos/112392262205377424364/albums?banner=pwa