News:

Classified ads are not allowed on the forum.

Main Menu

1969 Rear Spring Rates?

Started by olympic69, January 20, 2010, 10:09:18 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

olympic69

I may have this all wrong- but in looking at spring rates (rear) the Z28 shows a rate of 103, while other base models have up to 126 Lbs, while the 427 CI option shows a 4 leaf 126 Lb spring. I used the MOOG 6308 in my Z28 as a replacement, and additionally Mr. Pozzi recommends 125-150 rear rates- so why did GM choose to use such a "light" spring on the "HD" model(s), which would seem to make the car prone to oversteer?
Rob
Olympic Gold X33

"Its all crazy..."

JohnZ

Quote from: olympic69 on January 20, 2010, 10:09:18 AMwhy did GM choose to use such a "light" spring on the "HD" model(s), which would seem to make the car prone to oversteer?

It's the other way around - lower rear spring rate reduces rear roll stiffness, which reduces the tendency for oversteer.
'69 Z/28
Fathom Green
CRG

olympic69

Thanks- I appreciate the response from a reliable source!
Rob
Olympic Gold X33

"Its all crazy..."

BlackoutSteve

I always thought monos were ~145in/lbs.. 4 & 5 leaves are naturally a heavier rate.
Restoring my RHD 69 Jane in Melbourne, Australia.
http://www.usmuscle.com.au/Forum/showthread.php?t=2840