This stamp look original

[dannystarr]

Not a great pic. I didn't  take it. Hard to see. But does the actual fonting look correct. And is it in the DB? ... nevermind, cant get the pic to load from my phone. I am traveling. I will try when at my PC. Danny

[dannystarr]

OK,
I am back at my computer. I will try to get this pic posted in the next day or so. ... Danny

[dannystarr]

Here is the picture. NOT a great pic, broaching can't be seen. BUT, is the stamp/fonting original. This is in a Sept. '68 68' Z/28... Danny

[jdv69z]

Sep 67?

[william]

124378L305805 would have been built October of '67.

Was on ebay 2010. Body with the engine was not configured for a Muncie trans.

[jwbavalon]

Wouldn't a October 1967 build have a engine suffix of MO? 

[MO]

Wouldn't a October 1967 build have a engine suffix of MO? 

Yes. All 68's required smog, so all should be the same code.

[Petes L48]

Danny do you have any of the  block casting numbers? 

[dannystarr]

I was waiting for more info. I have nothing else at this time. I do know that it was in a Sept. of 1968 Camaro Z/28. So there is a that MP, which seems wrong. On eBay in 2010? was it a numbers matching car at that time for the ad? Guess we better let this one go. But is the stamp real for what it is?... Danny

[KurtS]

It was a rolling shell.
Block 3914678, I217. It was an ME, overstamped to be MP.  No MP code in 68.
124378L305805

[CantRepeat]

It was a rolling shell.
Block 3914678, I217. It was an ME, overstamped to be MP.  No MP code in 68.
124378L305805

After reading your post you can clearly see the top of the P is not stamped the same as everything else.

[169INDY]

Where is the Joe'Dirt Busted GIF?

[dannystarr]

Thanx Kurt/William/Everyone.. It's a hard pass. Just a car, nothing special I guess. ... Danny

[169INDY]

Ad Copy??

[dannystarr]

No ad, sent to me by a friend. Or I should say, I didn't look for a "for sale" ad. No longer interested. ... Danny