67 RS Vert > QUESTION - OPINIONS

[PANTHER-BUFF]

What are everyones thoughts on this car? The dealer says it has 13k original miles, but no proof. Whats this car worth?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=270835578924&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649

New interior, door panels with no chrome trim.

[68Zproject]

Well, at least it has the "caution fan" sticker.

[IZRSSS]

I would certainly question the engine pad. Even though the pic is low quality, there is no question it's been decked. However, I'm pretty sure it was done by the factory. Grinding pattern is similar to what John posted a while back. In addition, I really don't know what's so rare about this car other than the low miles. As for price (if everything checks out) I'd put it somewhere around the low 30's, if even that. Keep in mind its a 327. And as far as I'm concerned, a relatively stripped 327 at that.

I would also like to know why a 13K mile car was restored in the first place. I would ask for close up pics of the car before it was restored.

[tmodel66]

Does the trim tag look suspicious to anyone else?

[Petes L48]

There seems to be an awful lot of pitting in that pic of the RH lower control arm and x member.  Pretty rusty faceplate screws in the speedo shot, lack of any documentation, wear on the console and missing rear ashtray cover, etc.  It's just not passing the "smell test" for an original 13k car at this point.  Then there's the incorrect resto details.  What's the RPO for a body color matching 'vert top frame?       

[68Zproject]

Does the trim tag look suspicious to anyone else?

yep

[MyRed67]

This car would not have had the D91 stripe from the factory.   10C build,  the D91 stripe was only available on SS until Mar. of 67.  it looks nice though.

[MyRed67]

I think the uneven #'s on the odometer would indicate it has either rolled over, or has been turned back.

[KurtS]

Tag and pad look OK to me.....