Early 69 muncie on eBay 19n520879

[jim28607]

https://www.ebay.com/itm/222385162441

[1968RSZ28]

Transmission case is stamped: 19N520879  P9P17
Seller id: toymanm20
Seller location: Greensboro, NC

Paul

[1968RSZ28]

No sale 1-24-17...

Reserve not met = $1975.00

Relisted 1-24-17...

http://www.ebay.com/itm/222388007547?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2661&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT

Paul

[1968RSZ28]

No sale 1-27-17...

Reserve not met = $1600.00

Paul

[1968RSZ28]

Relisted 1-28-17...

http://www.ebay.com/itm/222391527226?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT

Paul

[1968RSZ28]

No sale 1-31-17...

Reserve not met = $1400.00

Relisted 1-31-17...

http://www.ebay.com/itm/222394626271?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT

Paul

[1968RSZ28]

No sale 2-3-17...

Reserve not met = $1400.00

Paul

[bcmiller]

It's probably getting close to what it's worth, but maybe still a bit high.

Why? Well it's not a proven true original M22. At least one plug MAY be the right type, but pic isn't great. It's too early to have the C ratio code in the assembly date, so that doesn't help. Gear set is new.

[hihorse]

i don't see the C in the assembly date

[bertfam]

i don't see the C in the assembly date

That's because that transmission was assembled a month before they started using the designator.

Ed

[bcmiller]

Right. Maybe my post wasn't clear.

Doesn't have it. Shouldn't have it. Just means can't use the assembly stamp to prove it was originally an M22.

[hihorse]

Your post was clear , I misread it