Topics

69 327 engine and trans 19N552379 for 124379N552379 or 124679N552379
On ebay now, seller has trans as well
from the listing

"This is an original 1969 Camaro 327 Motor Cast # 3932386 stamping on pad is 19N552379
V1I25FL. # on Heads 3927185. Turns over nicely never rebuilt ran nice when pulled over 10 years ago to install a big block. This motor comes complete with flywheel, starter, all pulleys, fuel pump, water pump, P/S Brackets, Alt Brkts, Distributor, Coil and bracket, all original stuff, never taken apart. perfect for a rebuild. The motor is date coded 8 L 6 which is December 6, 1968. This is an early 69 motor. All other pieces are dated accordingly.
The number on the pad is 19N552379 V125FLI The car now has a big block in it."

seller scvette53

auction :

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1969-Camaro-327-Motor-RS-SS-Z28-3932386-/261846606187?hash=item3cf746216b&vxp=mtr

Here is a picture of the rear axle stamp, tried to make the stamping as visible as possible with lighting. Looks like  PJ code + 1012 G with E underneath, which is 68 3.73 posi, BUT the casting date on the 3894860 center section is J 7 8 . This would be cast in October 68. Car is a 12A 69 Camaro, could this be correct?

So here is my crayon X2/3 ? almost nearly covered by the heathen who tried to mask the rust in that area with thick undercoating. Car has been living its life as a big block car, of which everything else checks out. 4 leaf spring, 12 bolt(more on this in the next episode). Hidden vins match. It has A/c , no muncie hole and looks like originally an auto(more in another episode), so it cant be a Z thus not a 3. Power windows, rear defrost, console, spoiler car(one smaller trunk lid torsion bar)

Could the guy on the line have made a mistake when getting used to the X codes? Looks like at the bottom, he tried to under score/straight line it and make the bottom of the 2 ?

The second picture is another I saw somewhere, which is a 2 that looks like it nearly became a 3. Maybe this can be filed under the liquid lunch possibility? Poor penmanship?

I guess I need someone who has seen a lot of these.... any opinions are appreciated, thanks