News:

Classified ads are not allowed on the forum.

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Hans L

#1
General Discussion / Re: Hood Hinge Rebuilds
May 26, 2026, 11:01:20 PM
Quote from: Sauron327 on May 26, 2026, 09:32:56 AM
Quote from: WaltZ on May 23, 2026, 08:38:33 AMHe did mine a number of years ago for my 69 and extremely pleased.
Great gentleman!
Hope he's still dong them.

Roland Hall
RGH Design & Engineering
1901 Jackson St,
Burbank CA

phone: 1.818.845.3574
Rowland is dead.

Sorry to hear the news.  I chatted with Roland over the phone a few times.  Quite the engineer and machinist.
#2
General Discussion / Re: Hood Hinge Rebuilds
May 25, 2026, 11:28:41 PM
Quote from: Jerry@CHP on May 18, 2026, 12:52:27 PMThanks, wasn't there a guy CA doing them too?


Jerry - Yes, I used Roland Hall as well in the LA area to rebuild both my '69Z and '69 Chevelle hinges.  He date stamps the rivets with the circular rings.  The rebuild/restoration looks very good.  Hans
#3
Team - this listing on BaT is getting a lot of comments regarding originality. No definitive conclusions if the engine/trans/rear axle are original to the car.   Casting dates appear to line-up with the build date, but the partial VIN stamps are in question.   Any thoughts on this one - real, re-stamp, or??   The seller has been very cooperative with providing images and responding to comments - hope we can help him out!

BaT Listing: https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1969-chevrolet-camaro-z-28-287/













#4
Just a data point - LA built Z.   04B.   VIN L529307.   Chassis Broadcast Copy Code in Box 198 - FM
#5
Quote from: hugger69z28rs on January 29, 2025, 07:22:00 PM
Hans L did you check all three motor mount bolts on your car? My top two bolts are coming up, but the bottom bolt is going down on mine.

Here's a pic.  Sorry, I couldn't find a clear picture before clean-up.    But yes, same as yours - top two up; bottom one down.

#6
Quote from: HOT3O2 on January 09, 2025, 04:01:46 PM
If there isn't one already I'd like to see more info or a thread on the known differences between the Norwood and Van Nuys built Camaros.

I asked similar questions last year - here's the thread

http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=20937.msg190599#msg190599
#7
My shop used ESSS 911678 for the inner fenders and underside of the hood.   I used it for the control arms as well, mixed per direction (6:1:1 I believe).   Pretty spot on sheen/gloss level in my opinion.    My IG link has pictures for the control arms for reference.
#8
General Discussion / Re: JohnZ's assembly article
February 20, 2024, 12:11:33 PM
Nice updates.   Appreciate it!
#9
Originality / Re: Spatter Paint
January 31, 2024, 08:06:49 PM
There's a pretty thorough thread on spatter paint, styles, painting techniques on the Yenko site.  Note that LA trunk spatter differ quite a bit from NOR.

https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=120533
#10
General Discussion / Re: Barrett Jackson
January 30, 2024, 06:56:03 PM
Quote from: uscrichter on January 30, 2024, 05:43:02 PM
I spent 3 days at the auction and checked out most of the Camaros, I think the ZL1 was about all the money considering that it had a column shifter, rebodied non-original engine! The Z-28 cross ram cars had re-pop manifolds, hoods and carbs, you can buy that set-up for around 6K, I can't see those driving the prices up that much unless it's an unknowing buyer.

In my opinion, the mystic of the Cross Ram Z has significantly diminished with the advent of the reproduction intakes.   Kinda too bad.

Yet this one pulled $242K:  https://www.barrett-jackson.com/Events/Event/Details/1969-CHEVROLET-CAMARO-Z28-271570
#11
General Discussion / Re: Barrett Jackson
January 29, 2024, 05:14:20 PM
Quote from: OrignlZ on January 28, 2024, 02:21:41 PM
Quote from: bcmiller on January 27, 2024, 06:23:50 PM
Market has softened a bit and will probably continue that trend.  It was pretty high (crazy in my opinion).

Didn't get to see the COPO cross the block but I did see 2 of the cross ram cars sell. I may be wrong but I feel like these cars were going for north of $200k a few years ago? These only ("only"  ::)) sold for $165k and $117k respectively. Scrolling the listing I found another that was sold for under $100k. I would think the last one probably had non matching #'s drivetrain to sell for as little as it did, not much to go off of in the description other than the original window sticker. But if it is an actual JL8 car you think that would bring more money. Maybe someone on here can shed some more light on that one.

https://www.barrett-jackson.com/Events/Event/Details/1969-CHEVROLET-CAMARO-Z28-RS-271876


The '69 Cortez RS Z - from the Description:    "Equipped with a non-OEM Trim Tag"......and still fetched $165K.
#12
Originality / Re: Center Link Inspection Markings?
December 21, 2023, 10:52:16 PM
Quote from: 68camaroz28 on December 21, 2023, 07:23:00 PM
I've not noted or read concerning consistent markings similar to driveshafts but the shaft has original finish look so why not? Document and I'd replicate. Assume you will restore by utilizing gun blue method and then go for it. Love the original things we find Hans.

Appreciate the feedback Chick.   Yes, I've documented the inspection marks and based on your and other feedback, will most likely attempt to replicate the graffiti.

And yes, I did hot blue the center link, following the process Lloyd used.   

Hers's a link of the result and process:  https://www.instagram.com/p/CtFXFKCyAtZ/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
#13
Originality / Center Link Inspection Markings?
December 21, 2023, 02:32:44 PM
Curious if there are any known consistent, correct inspection markings for the Center Link.   Based on a few forum reviews and discussions with others, its not clear what if any consistent inspection markings have been found on the Center Link.

Here's an older forum on the topic:   http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=17558.msg160038#msg160038

Here's some pictures of the Center Link and noted inspection markings from my '69 Camaro Z/28, Van Nuys build, 04B. 

Note the Big Pink blob plus a few circular stripes with some yellow as well as the two white dots near the idler arm.       

Thoughts?   Are these correct and should I replicate?







#14
General Discussion / Re: Radio restoration
November 09, 2023, 05:40:41 PM
I've had JV restore 2 radios - an AM for the Chevelle and an AM/FM Mono for the Z.   Very pleased with the quality of the restoration work:

Before:


After:



Before:


After:
#15
Older thread - have a few questions and adding my wiper motor data -

Question - For LOS cars, if the wiper motor is stamped with a PN, does that imply it did not get a sticker?   

From the very limited data set, this appears to be the case.   I found no evidence of sticker when I removed the wiper motor back in the day.

Data from my car:
Build Week:   LOS/NOR:   RS/NonRS    Sticker PN   Stamp PN   Sticker Codes    Wiper Motor Plant    Other
   04B                  LOS              RS                -                5045605            -                    Rochester                See Solenoid PIC Below for codes

Washer Pump:
<a href="https://app.photobucket.com/u/jwlittooy/a/9fc3c05d-1e86-4845-82cf-1d16732c0e05/p/a7179038-67f4-4132-9c8f-8c40d1052f6a?width=590&height=370&fit=bounds" target="_blank">RSWasherPump4_zps95238ca5</a>

Wiper Motor:
<a href="https://app.photobucket.com/u/jwlittooy/a/aa505d10-0ec5-4419-969e-f4b240264f62/p/9624f764-e1bb-4410-90e4-28458f843e1b?width=590&height=370&fit=bounds" target="_blank">IMG_2545</a>