News:

Classified ads are not allowed on the forum.

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Ozbax

#1
Great photos, thanks for sharing. Looked like a good day for it. From what I can see there was  a nice variety of cars there too, which is good to see.

Brian.
#2
Decoding/Numbers / Re: VIN versus Cowl Tag
May 06, 2019, 04:33:23 AM
And yes, it was advertised as a genuine matching numbers RS/SS.
#3
Decoding/Numbers / Re: VIN versus Cowl Tag
May 05, 2019, 04:21:13 PM
Those old posts certainly make interesting reading. So looks like someone has had a go at re-stamping the decked (327) block, or has had another engine swap along the way.
#4
Decoding/Numbers / Re: VIN versus Cowl Tag
May 04, 2019, 10:40:06 PM
Thanks, yes that is what I thought too.
#5
Decoding/Numbers / VIN versus Cowl Tag
May 04, 2019, 10:23:54 PM
Hi all,
I was considering looking at a 67 RS/SS and  requested the tag details from the owner before I committed to travel to view the car in person. From the pics I received the VIN is 124377N212188 and the cowl tag says 11E build date. This does not appear right to me - seeking some expert opinion on this. Car has obviously been restored at some point and appears to have a non-original drive train. 10 bolt diff and a very odd looking engine stamp -misaligned characters in the engine code and suffix is MT (cowl tag says powerglide), and from the photo partial VIN is not visible.
So my questions are;
Is it possible that the tags are correct together (as in time-frame)?
Should engine codes always be aligned ie gang stamped? (although in this case I think the suffix is wrong for this car anyway).

Thanks in advance,
Brian.