CRG Discussion Forum

Camaro Research Group Discussion => Originality => Topic started by: sixt9x33rs on November 26, 2010, 10:22:28 AM

Title: L-65 vs LM-1
Post by: sixt9x33rs on November 26, 2010, 10:22:28 AM
What is the difference between the two motors above other than the LM-1 has a 4V vs the L-65 with the 2V? Any valve, cam difference?

Thanks

Lawrence
Title: Re: L-65 vs LM-1
Post by: 69LM1 on November 26, 2010, 04:07:21 PM
For a few,
The LM1, in most cases got a 12 bolt and the L65 a 10 Bolt. In transmissions, the LM1 and SS cars got the Muncie MC1 as the base and upgraded 4 speeds, the L65 was a saginaw for the base transmission(s).

"The LM1 was replaced in January of 1969 by the L65 engine option, a 350 with a 2-barrel carb, rated at 250hp and priced at $21.10. Other than the carb, intake, and distributor changes, it was the same engine as the LM1. It would appear that this was a minor change with only a rated 5 hp reduction. But the effect on the L65 powertrain was dramatic."

(emphasis mine)

Engine info here:
http://www.camaros.org/lm1.shtml#engine

Camaros.org info here:
http://www.camaros.org/lm1.shtml

I run a registry here:
http://www.69lm1.com

Rich


Title: Re: L-65 vs LM-1
Post by: sixt9x33rs on November 27, 2010, 06:27:17 PM
Does the L-65 have the same air cleaner setup as the LM-1 or does it look more like the 327/210 air cleaner?

Thanks
Title: Re: L-65 vs LM-1
Post by: 69LM1 on November 27, 2010, 10:01:21 PM
The LM1 and SS350 (L48) both had the exact same air cleaner setup, with the chrome lid. As far as the LM1 vs the L65, the L65 was setup for a 2bbl carb and no chrome lid. Not sure of any other differences? Possibly someone else might know more.

Rich