CRG Discussion Forum

Camaro Research Group Discussion => Originality => Topic started by: 68Zproject on May 30, 2017, 11:27:38 AM

Title: 68 Open Element Breather Hose
Post by: 68Zproject on May 30, 2017, 11:27:38 AM
Any idea if either of these is correct for the 68 breather?  Both, neither?

(http://i174.photobucket.com/albums/w112/68zproject/IMG_2667_zpsqtbmskuj.jpg) (http://s174.photobucket.com/user/68zproject/media/IMG_2667_zpsqtbmskuj.jpg.html)
(http://i174.photobucket.com/albums/w112/68zproject/IMG_2681_zps2agosfp2.jpg) (http://s174.photobucket.com/user/68zproject/media/IMG_2681_zps2agosfp2.jpg.html)
(http://i174.photobucket.com/albums/w112/68zproject/IMG_2684_zpsdkeyi381.jpg) (http://s174.photobucket.com/user/68zproject/media/IMG_2684_zpsdkeyi381.jpg.html)
(http://i174.photobucket.com/albums/w112/68zproject/IMG_2682_zpst8lgqqcu.jpg) (http://s174.photobucket.com/user/68zproject/media/IMG_2682_zpst8lgqqcu.jpg.html)
Title: Re: 68 Open Element Breather Hose
Post by: 68Zproject on June 06, 2017, 11:14:19 AM
 Jerry shows this part # 3932336 (which the tagged one is) in his book as correct.  AIM shows that as a "was" #.  Is there one that is more correct appearing as original?
Title: Re: 68 Open Element Breather Hose
Post by: 68Zproject on June 11, 2017, 10:14:40 AM
I think I'm finding that the one on it is too long and that's why it doesn't fit quite at 90*.  The other hose is shorter and therefore fits better too.