Author Topic: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification  (Read 4259 times)

clm69z28

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 39
    • View Profile
1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« on: June 13, 2012, 04:57:31 AM »
Ebay item http://www.ebay.com/itm/330702718155.  Any opinion as to the stamp and condition?  

keech

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 37
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2012, 10:31:47 AM »
my opinion....   It looks like it was a 1111481 and they changed it to 480.   

jdv69z

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 714
  • 69 RS Z/28 52E
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2012, 07:16:13 PM »
Compared stamped to my original. All I can say is that if that  is a re-stamp, then the fraud quality is getting scary. On my dist, however, the  year stamp '8' (mine is '68 manuf) is closer to the date. Don't know if that matters.

Jimmy V.
Jimmy V.

BULLITT65

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1878
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2012, 10:04:49 PM »
I am looking for a may 111480 as well, and have looked closely at this one sold by the king. It would be nice if Kurt or Jerry would share their knowledge here.
1969 garnet red Z/28 46k mile unrestored X77
Looking for 3192477 (front) spiral shocks 3192851 (rear) please
Looking for an original LOF soft ray windshield
Looking for original Delco side post negative battery cable part # 6297651AV

L78 steve

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 566
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2012, 05:18:21 PM »
I'll take a pic. of a 480 I have in my Sun machine and email it to you tomorrow AM and you can post it and compare.
69 Z/28 Dover White X33,ZL2,PS,M20,Std.int.04C
67 SS/RS Mt. Green 1W,2LGSR,3SL,4K,5BY,07C
70 Nova L78 Blk. Cherry,Sandalwood,M21,02B

KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3513
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2012, 04:44:18 AM »
Kurt does not even look at distributors.... :)
Kurt S
CRG

BULLITT65

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1878
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2012, 04:49:30 AM »
Sorry, your reputation precedes you. Thought you may have a decent picture library of original 1111480 distributors, or would have a decent knowledge to tell if this one was original or not.

DavidS

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
  • z28.net
    • View Profile
    • www.z28.net
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #7 on: June 18, 2012, 10:32:50 PM »
my opinion....   It looks like it was a 1111481 and they changed it to 480.   

I don't know,

but here's a 481:


here's a picture of my 480 before Jerry M restored it:



KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3513
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2012, 02:31:00 AM »
Sorry, your reputation precedes you. Thought you may have a decent picture library of original 1111480 distributors, or would have a decent knowledge to tell if this one was original or not.
I have thousands of engine pad pics. But I had to draw the line somewhere. :)

BULLITT65

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1878
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2012, 07:48:07 AM »
lol, I understand Kurt. Based on the pictures provided here I would still appreciate your opinion. What is your take? a 111481 that has been changed?

KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3513
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #10 on: June 21, 2012, 08:23:07 PM »
Jerry might have an opinion on it. Ask him.

rat pack

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 222
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #11 on: June 28, 2012, 02:39:46 AM »
May be a restamp as there appears to be a "1" hiding under the left edge of the "0". I have a 481 distributor with a build date of 9 D 1 and other than the "0" it appears exactly the same.......RatPack...............
Just keep livin......L I V I N .............

rat pack

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 222
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #12 on: June 28, 2012, 02:41:04 AM »
Here is the picture from the auction enlarged showing what appears to be a "1" behind the edge of the "0"............RatPack............

BULLITT65

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1878
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #13 on: June 28, 2012, 03:12:10 AM »
great pictures guys, another difference is how oval the zero is vs. the other 480 the zero is more round in the stamp. I think we have our answer, i wonder if the King over paid for it or if made it?

68Zproject

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1634
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #14 on: June 29, 2012, 06:23:12 PM »
great pictures guys, another difference is how oval the zero is vs. the other 480 the zero is more round in the stamp.

And crooked.   
68Z28

69Z28-RS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2907
  • owner since 4-Apr-1976
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #15 on: June 30, 2012, 04:53:09 AM »
Are you speaking of the 'zero' being crooked?   :)
Gary W / 09C 69Z28-RS, 72 B 720 cowl console rosewood tint
69 Corvette convertible, silver/black 350 hp,
60 Corvette white/red, 72 Corvette coupe, '70 Mach I 
90 ZR1 red/red #246, 90 ZR1 white/gray #2466
72 El Camino, '55-'56-'57 Nomads, '55-'57 B/A Sedan

red69

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #16 on: June 30, 2012, 02:18:16 PM »
Are people paying that kind off money for real 1111480 distributors?

BULLITT65

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1878
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #17 on: June 30, 2012, 07:34:29 PM »
The most expensive I saw one go was 900 a few months ago, since then I have seen them 700 a couple of months after that, and then 500.

69Z28-RS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2907
  • owner since 4-Apr-1976
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #18 on: July 01, 2012, 06:40:13 PM »
It might mean that all the *real* ones are in use, and people are now 'making them'...?

BULLITT65

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1878
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #19 on: July 02, 2012, 01:33:35 AM »
The ones I saw that sold looked legit, the one for 700 was given the ok by jerry.

red69

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #20 on: July 02, 2012, 02:57:35 PM »
When I bought my car in 1975 it had a 600 Holley and a dual point aftermarket distributor installed on it. Before I left I asked if he had any other parts for the car, I walked out with the original carb and distributor. Guess it never hurts to ask!

clm69z28

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 39
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #21 on: July 03, 2012, 03:31:41 PM »
I see what the concern is on the mark behind/next to the 0, but if you look to the left in the photo you can see the same kind of mark at about the same position.  I wonder if that wasn't part of the machining process and it just happened to end up under the #?  Even Ratpack's distributor seems to have something that looks like a similar type marking. I can't disagree on the zero though.

jdv69z

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 714
  • 69 RS Z/28 52E
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #22 on: July 03, 2012, 03:56:32 PM »
It also looks like a second "2" behind the 2. Like it was double stamped? The "O" definitely looks to be a different font, but don't know if that's OK or not.

Jimmy V.

lynnbilodeau

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 267
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #23 on: July 05, 2012, 12:30:49 AM »
great pictures guys, another difference is how oval the zero is vs. the other 480 the zero is more round in the stamp. I think we have our answer, i wonder if the King over paid for it or if made it?

I don't believe Chuck restamps anything.  However, he had restamped it, he would be selling as a restamp.

I am still not convinced it is a restamp.  One would have to find another 9 E 12 distributor to compare, preferably a couple.

BULLITT65

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1878
    • View Profile
Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp Verification
« Reply #24 on: July 05, 2012, 02:22:55 AM »
Well he doesn't say "genuine not a restamp", like he does in his other auctions, seems fishy to me