CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2014, 02:06:37 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97088 Posts in 11682 Topics by 4578 Members
Latest Member: ronhill
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  General Discussion
| | |-+  1969 camaro z28 brake booster mounting nuts
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: 1969 camaro z28 brake booster mounting nuts  (Read 514 times)
wisemanz28
Member
***
Posts: 134


View Profile Email
« on: February 07, 2012, 08:47:14 PM »

Are the mounting nuts on a 1969 camaro z28 brake booster supposed to be a shouldered nut or a nut with a lock washer?
Logged
1968 Z28
Member
***
Posts: 383


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2012, 09:51:42 PM »

1968 and 1969 AIM's say a nut and lock washer.  My 1968 has the nut and lock washer.
Logged

Jerry G.

Z28-1968-07C-Norwood
Ermine White, Red Std. Interior
2 Owner, 38,000 miles
JohnZ
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 3956


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2012, 11:51:47 AM »

The booster bracket-to-firewall attachment uses plain nuts and split lockwashers, and the master cylinder-to-booster uses prevailing-torque Stover nuts (no lockwashers).
Logged

'69 Z/28
Fathom Green
CRG
wisemanz28
Member
***
Posts: 134


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2012, 12:44:18 PM »

Thanks a million guys
Logged
KevinW
Member
***
Posts: 397


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2012, 04:03:39 PM »

I had to go look up what the h*ll a stover nuts was! Smiley



Now I have to look at my car!
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.075 seconds with 17 queries.