Author Topic: 1969 Transmission date and VIN  (Read 4982 times)

bcmiller

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4030
    • View Profile
1969 Transmission date and VIN
« on: February 14, 2010, 02:50:41 PM »
Let me know what you think of this one.  I have asked a couple of experts already.  M22 assembled in late January but VIN of the car stamped on it is from early August.  

Does anyone else have a big time gap from when your M22 was assembled compared to when it was installed in the car?  Thanks.
Bryon / 1968 Camaro SS 396 coupe - now old school 468 big block
1967 Camaro RS/SS 396 coupe L35/M40 - 4 generation family project
Looking for 68 Camaro with body # NOR 181016

Jerry@CHP

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1512
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 Transmission date and VIN
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2010, 03:50:29 PM »
Character spacing and aspect ratio does not look correct on the trans assm code.

I will say that it is possible to have a wider date range on M22's for '68 and '69 because so few were sold.  Especially in 1968.  I think a little over 1200 units were sold for the whole model year.

Jerry 

bcmiller

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4030
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 Transmission date and VIN
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2010, 03:56:33 PM »
Thanks Jerry.  The P is what looks a bit funny to me. 

Anybody else?  You are not going to hurt my feelings, no matter what you say.
Bryon / 1968 Camaro SS 396 coupe - now old school 468 big block
1967 Camaro RS/SS 396 coupe L35/M40 - 4 generation family project
Looking for 68 Camaro with body # NOR 181016

JohnZ

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4365
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 Transmission date and VIN
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2010, 05:14:51 PM »
Thanks Jerry.  The P is what looks a bit funny to me. 

Anybody else?  You are not going to hurt my feelings, no matter what you say.

The Muncie date code stamping definitely isn't "typical".
'69 Z/28
Fathom Green
CRG

william

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3133
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 Transmission date and VIN
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2010, 05:23:39 PM »
I have data from 27 M-22 '69 Camaros. None are even close to that far off. I have the same date as yours in an 02A car. The closest VIN to yours has a late April M-22. Bear in mind that only 2,117 '69s had the M-22.

However a look at other far more common M-20 & M-21 Muncies reveals more outliers. I list 2 Oct '69 cars with May trans; one with June. One of the last '69s built 11A has a June 23 trans. This tells me that it was quite possible for a Muncie trans to either be delayed in shipment somehow or to remain in queue at the assembly plant for many months. I have read that Chevy moved parts between car assembly plants as needed. It could be that your trans was at a Chevelle or full-size plant when production for the model year concluded in June/July '69. It went to Norwood and ended up in your 07A Camaro.
Learning more and more about less and less...

william

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3133
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 Transmission date and VIN
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2010, 05:26:53 PM »
Compare it to the M-22 stamp in JM's 69 book p. 67. Looks the same to me.
Learning more and more about less and less...

bcmiller

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4030
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 Transmission date and VIN
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2010, 06:00:59 PM »
Thanks Willliam.  I don't have JMs 69 book, but I have the 67/68.  I guess I need to get the 69 too.

This is great information.  Thanks for sharing.
Bryon / 1968 Camaro SS 396 coupe - now old school 468 big block
1967 Camaro RS/SS 396 coupe L35/M40 - 4 generation family project
Looking for 68 Camaro with body # NOR 181016

KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5898
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 Transmission date and VIN
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2010, 04:01:26 AM »
I have another M22 stamp with the same date. Looks the same.
Kurt S
CRG