CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 20, 2014, 09:34:36 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106418 Posts in 12405 Topics by 4785 Members
Latest Member: Bolaro 67 SS350
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  General Discussion
| | |-+  '67 Z28 At Cecil County
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All Print
Author Topic: '67 Z28 At Cecil County  (Read 5968 times)
blownonfuel
Member
***
Posts: 68


View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: October 15, 2009, 07:19:07 PM »

I say it goes 10:48 with a 9 on the end.
Logged
1968RSZ28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4812



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: October 15, 2009, 10:41:47 PM »

And man does it H O O K!  Grin

You're not kidding...

Paul
Logged
JoeC
Member
***
Posts: 350


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: October 16, 2009, 06:56:23 PM »

I put 10.53 ET for 3200Lbs car in the drag calculater and it says will need 542 hp

that's a lot of power from a 302

good luck Jerry
Logged
1968RSZ28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4812



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: October 16, 2009, 08:15:18 PM »

I put 10.53 ET for 3200Lbs car in the drag calculater and it says will need 542 hp

that's a lot of power from a 302

Yup, Jerry is going to have to give the 302 a little more than half throttle...    Grin    Grin    Grin

Paul
Logged
Jerry@CHP
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 1445



View Profile Email
« Reply #19 on: October 17, 2009, 10:38:53 AM »

My back up engine went 10.64 last year at 124 mph.  And I did not have the suspension dialed in like I do now.  Could only come out at 5600 rpm, now I can come out as high as 6600 rpm. 

That was weighing in at 3190 in 200 Ft of corrected altitude.  That engine on the dyno made 474 hp.  The engine in the car now is better than the one I took out.  See how that ET from last year calulates to the HP and weight of the car.

Jerry
Logged
JoeC
Member
***
Posts: 350


View Profile Email
« Reply #20 on: October 17, 2009, 03:18:42 PM »

the first calculator didn't have the mph plug in because I don't know it for the 10.53 ET
here is a different calculater that has the MPH plug in. It is more accurate to use MPH


10.73 ET 123MPH 3190LBS = 487HP (from video)

10.64 ET 124MPH 3190LBS = 499HP

10.53 ET 126MPH 3200LBS = 521HP  (estimated MPH)
Logged
Jerry@CHP
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 1445



View Profile Email
« Reply #21 on: October 17, 2009, 04:30:29 PM »

Went 124.08 as the best mph for the new car.  Car in the 10.50's would be in the 124-126 mph range.  For me, maybe 125 mph.

Just found out that J. Duzac went 10.55 this morning at the NHRA Reynolds, GA points race.  Another 67 302 car but not a real Z28.  He is the fastest D/Stick car as of now.  Also heard that the air was very good this morning for qualifiying.

Jerry
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.093 seconds with 17 queries.