CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2014, 04:10:40 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97523 Posts in 11718 Topics by 4581 Members
Latest Member: Cooper48
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  Originality
| | |-+  ? California Plates - 1967 corresponding letters ?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2  All Print
Author Topic: ? California Plates - 1967 corresponding letters ?  (Read 6132 times)
my124677n
Member
***
Posts: 48


View Profile
« on: March 22, 2009, 01:09:00 PM »

Wondering if any California folks out there have a 1967 model year vehicle with original plates starting with a late Txx - xxx number. Most have U's and early V's. 
Logged
1967RS/SS
Member
***
Posts: 148


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2009, 06:46:22 PM »

My Camaro is a TYM...
Logged

1967 RS/SS L-48
Van Nuys 01C
Joe
KurtS
CRG Coordinator
*****
Posts: 3068


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2009, 10:03:46 PM »

Depends on where the car was first registered. My understanding is that some area used up their letter allotments faster than others.

And yes, there are other 67's that start with T's.
Logged

Kurt S
CRG
GaryL
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 538


Marilyn and me

gandmal
View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2009, 10:54:32 PM »

When I bought my current set of black plates, the collector/dealer I bought them from told me this. In 1963 the state sent AAA001 thru HHH999 (approximately) out to the different counties. Once they needed more plates the next in the series was sent out to the county asking. Early on a new 1963 car could have received any thing between AAA0001 and HHH999 depending where it was purchased. Just what I was told.
Logged

Gary

Lemans Blue X33. DZ, M20, manual steering. Only BU code rear end is original.
my124677n
Member
***
Posts: 48


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2009, 11:34:29 PM »

Thanks for the info. Just wanted to make sure I could buy some "T" plates as well as "U" plates for the July '09 YOM rule changes.
Logged
kforce
Member
***
Posts: 35



View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: March 28, 2009, 01:13:02 AM »

My Camaro is a TYM...

When was your manufacture date on the trim tag??
Logged

1967 RS/SS 350 - PG - Sierra Fawn - Black Vinyl - Gold Deluxe
1974 Z/28 - 4-speed - Silver (with those ridiculous stripes)  Black Interior
1998 Z/28 - 6-speed - Bright green - Convertible
my124677n
Member
***
Posts: 48


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 29, 2009, 07:08:31 PM »

the car was a late 67 build, June 67, so really I should be using late U's or early V's, but a 67 is a 67, so if I find nice late T's I'll use them. Thanks.
Logged
1967RS/SS
Member
***
Posts: 148


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: March 31, 2009, 06:32:54 PM »

My Camaro is a TYM...

When was your manufacture date on the trim tag??

01C (3rd week of January)

Logged

1967 RS/SS L-48
Van Nuys 01C
Joe
fireZ
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 548



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 01, 2009, 02:10:59 PM »

My 1968 Z28 with a build date of 02E has plates that start with VNK ----.This car was sold from Selman Chevrolet out of Orange California
Logged

1968 Z28 LA Built
LIC # RPO Z28
plasiter
Member
***
Posts: 38


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 02, 2009, 01:46:49 PM »

My 06A 67 Z was built in Los Angeles and sold new in San Bernadino, CA in June 1967.  Its original black plates started with "VDH."  I hope this helps.  Paul
Logged

1967 Z/28 - Factory Special Order Flambeau Red Paint (Close to Hugger Orange) in 1967!
genminmar
Member
***
Posts: 26


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: May 16, 2009, 07:03:05 PM »

I have three blackplate Camaros #1  is a 1st week of October 66 build date with SWUxxx  #2 is a 2nd week of November 66 build date with TVRxxx and #3 is a 1st week of December build date and is UDKxxx  Take into account some cars spent a little more time on the car lot and got later Alpha letters because they were at the DMV 4,5 and 6 weeks and maybe even longer depending on when the car sold. So it will have a later sequential order. Another possibility is that an out of state transfer could take place on a 4 or 5 month old Camaro and could get a much later sequential order.
Logged
RS3SDL2MG
Member
***
Posts: 141


Brad


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: May 16, 2009, 09:58:54 PM »

I don't know if this will help your delima or not but here is a vintage 1968 picture and you can read the california license number as

WQD-593

Logged

1967 RS 327 (210) horse C-C ermine white 732 bright blue interior RARE 4P - DELETE
GaryL
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 538


Marilyn and me

gandmal
View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: May 17, 2009, 09:55:10 AM »

I was at an all Camaro show a week ago. There were many black plate cars. The following is what I recorded for these cars.

1967
UFH = 05D
TUR = 10B
UBS =  12A
ECS = 12A

1969
YXD = 12C
YHN = 12C
YJX = 02C
YHA = 07A
XXD = 09D
YHS = 01D
YHZ = 02D
YXV = 02D (my original black plate prefix) . I have a set of YHZ to go replace my long-gone originals.

The ECS car had to have original plates. There has never been a way to get black plates registered after first issue, before July 2009.
Logged

Gary

Lemans Blue X33. DZ, M20, manual steering. Only BU code rear end is original.
genminmar
Member
***
Posts: 26


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: May 17, 2009, 11:22:04 AM »

GaryL,  Just got to thinking. Huh There is the possibility even if the ECS=12A car had a current sticker on it, it  may not actually be a bonified registered car. Beings it was at a car show does not mean it was driven on a California road or highway to get there, could have came on a trailer. But it would look good at the show with the black plate and "assuming" a current sticker. I really do not know it to be this way, just a guess. My logic is, the sequential order for a 67 Camaro with an ECS prefix is way to early of the "E" letter to be applied to the car when in fact as was stated above the Oct 66 build car had "SWUxxx for the prefix. I also have two 64 Novas and they carry #1 car PBRxxx and #2 car has PCKxx for the prefix. So my thinking is that the cars with a prefix letter begining with "E" must be earlier than these 64 Novas and that a 67 Camaro with an "E" prefix does not allow by the timing and release of plates regarding the plates being distributed in a sequential order. Point is, "The time frame does not allow" If anyone is looking for black plates they should be certain of the approximate date windows in which the car should fall into. All the information in these post can get you close by weeding out inaccuracies. But if we had some input from people with 1963 cars we could ascertain if maybe the prefix of "E" fits in prior to 1964. You can appear at a car show in Illinois and show it with period correct California Black Plate, but then after the show reinstall the Illinois plate and drive it out of the gate. We will wait for those with 63' cars to weigh in. Great topic though.

Note: In my earlier response to this topic I incorrectly stated the #3 car build date, should have been (#3 car build date third week Jan. 1967 01C  black plate prefix UDKxxx)
« Last Edit: May 17, 2009, 11:53:03 AM by genminmar » Logged
GaryL
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 538


Marilyn and me

gandmal
View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: May 17, 2009, 02:20:44 PM »

I will see that car again, I am sure. It was driven to the show. I can not say 100% it had current stickers. It is possible the owner just puts the plates on for shows. It is also posible they are original depending in which county the car was first registered. Read my post #3 above. The plates were not issued in sequential order. Huh
Logged

Gary

Lemans Blue X33. DZ, M20, manual steering. Only BU code rear end is original.
Pages: [1] 2  All Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.084 seconds with 18 queries.