CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 21, 2014, 01:28:55 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105611 Posts in 12333 Topics by 4753 Members
Latest Member: stpatrick
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  Restoration
| | |-+  Stripes - to feel them or not to feel them
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All Print
Author Topic: Stripes - to feel them or not to feel them  (Read 6093 times)
smith69z
Member
***
Posts: 55


View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: January 25, 2009, 08:35:39 AM »

Thanks for all the input.  And thank you Jerry for taking my call!
Logged
firstgenaddict
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1248



View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: January 25, 2009, 02:34:00 PM »

Single step the stripes...
Logged

James
Collectin' Camaro's since "Only Rednecks drove them"
 
Check out the Black 69 RS/Z28 45k mile Survivor and the Lemans Blue 69 Z 10D frame off...
https://picasaweb.google.com/112392262205377424364/1969_Z28_Restoration
RamAirDave
Member
***
Posts: 334


RamAirDave
View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #17 on: January 26, 2009, 02:25:40 AM »

While you can't exactly recreate the lacquer paint with the modern BC/CC, you can get fairly close;  however, Camaro judging gives a "pass" when it comes to this (the largest area of the car) as far as restoring as they rolled of the line.

Does it really matter if you can "feel" the stripe if the rest of the paint looks nothing like factory?  A $20K flawless paint job that in no way looks like factory, but you can feel the stripe edge....  I know that "it is what it is" for judging, but it does seem a bit silly, doesn't it?
Logged

"Build them how the designers and engineers envisioned them to be"

www.TheMuscleCarGuys.com
Jerry@CHP
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 1445



View Profile Email
« Reply #18 on: January 26, 2009, 09:20:15 AM »

Dave,

The lacquer of today is nothing like it was manufactured 40 years ago.  So saying that using 2009 lacquer (getting very hard to find in any form) is just like the factory paint is flat out incorrect.  The base coat clear coat systems when done right will look very good and last a life time.  Come look at my '68 red Z28.  The paint is falling off and checking badly.  Plus there is the shrinkage factor.  GM paints did not shrink up like over the counter lacquer does.

I own two survivor original paint Z28s and my new race car when parked next to them looks very much the same. 

Now I have to spent another $15K or more for another paint job onthe red car.  You can bet I will use the BC/CC system this time.

We will have to agree to disagree.

Jerry
Logged
RamAirDave
Member
***
Posts: 334


RamAirDave
View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #19 on: January 27, 2009, 12:06:12 AM »

I wasn't the one recommending painting a car in lacquer.  It's been junk for a looooong time as you know.

My question is about making an attempt for BC/CC to look similar to factory vs. perfect and how it would be judged.

Here's an example.  Gorgeous paint, no doubt, but doesn't look like factory.  Would it be docked points on the sheet?

Logged

"Build them how the designers and engineers envisioned them to be"

www.TheMuscleCarGuys.com
Jerry@CHP
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 1445



View Profile Email
« Reply #20 on: January 27, 2009, 07:44:08 AM »

Dave,

We do like to see a little bit of texture in the finish when judging.  I agree that many are over restored, paint is too thick, edges are too fat, metalic is too big, etc.

Jerry
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.079 seconds with 17 queries.