CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2015, 04:09:02 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
112113 Posts in 12879 Topics by 4931 Members
Latest Member: Euclid
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  General Discussion
| | |-+  Rear end gear
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Rear end gear  (Read 1922 times)
Posts: 460

67 SS

View Profile
« on: March 04, 2006, 03:11:33 PM »

 Undecided CRG! Once again I need the expertise of CRG. I am contemplating changing the rear gear in my 67 Camaro. Presently I have a 3:08, which is no doubt extremely nice for cruisning down the highway at a lower rpm, good gas mileage but terrible on the front end response from a light or lower speed. I don't want to go to the extreme of a quick response and loose the crusing rpms and gas mileage. In everyones expert opinion, what gearing would you choose to gain some front end response without loosing to much of the crusing rpm and gas mileage? I know there will be a trade off but I want to keep it to a minimum. Something like maybe 3:42 or 3:55?Huh Oh yea I have a  350 4bbl and 2spd powerglide. I just put Flowtech headers on


Posts: 84

View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2006, 04:54:05 PM »

If the rearend is original, have you considered a different torque converter?  You never have to admit it and it can definitely help low speed acceleration.  Don't get carried away, a 2000 RPM converter will be inexpensive and really help.  Probably less work than going through the rearend anyway.  If you are going to a higher speed converter, DO NOT forget that there will be additional heat load at the transmission, especially at low vehicle speeds--adding an aftermarket trans cooler is always a benefit for transmission durability and lifespan.  Dave
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.064 seconds with 17 queries.