CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2014, 03:04:54 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97207 Posts in 11691 Topics by 4578 Members
Latest Member: ronhill
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  Decoding/Numbers
| | |-+  1969 Brake Booster
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All Print
Author Topic: 1969 Brake Booster  (Read 8241 times)
fireZ
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 548



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: November 30, 2008, 02:12:28 PM »

Our cars probably met in the parking lot at LOS and seem to have some of the same dated componets and some differant dated componets. I suspect parts were not looked at as far as dates but rather if it was the correct part it was installed as the cars went down the line. As new stock arrived i doubt it was put to the back of inventory until the older parts were used.
Logged

1968 Z28 LA Built
LIC # RPO Z28
JohnZ
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 3958


View Profile Email
« Reply #16 on: November 30, 2008, 04:37:17 PM »

I suspect parts were not looked at as far as dates but rather if it was the correct part it was installed as the cars went down the line. As new stock arrived i doubt it was put to the back of inventory until the older parts were used.

That's correct - nobody in the plants paid any attention at all to part dates, and inventory control was minimal; whatever was on the line (whether it came from off-line storage or a just-arrived truck or rail car) got put on cars. Not true these days, but it was then.
Logged

'69 Z/28
Fathom Green
CRG
fireZ
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 548



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: November 30, 2008, 04:45:53 PM »

Thanks for chiming in John. I am more suspect of cars when all the dated parts are very close together compared to a car with sparatic dates. My Grandfather worked at Oshawa GM for years and he use to laugh when I got talking about all the parts on these cars should be within 4-6 weeks of the cars build date. He said the same as you that parts were used as they came to the line not by the dates stamped on them.
Logged

1968 Z28 LA Built
LIC # RPO Z28
KurtS
CRG Coordinator
*****
Posts: 3068


View Profile Email
« Reply #18 on: December 02, 2008, 03:47:48 AM »

That's true, but look at the Tarrytown plant pics again. Those parts were getting used up at one a minute. There wasn't inventory control, but sheer volume dictate that a lot of the parts were fresh. Not all, but a lot. Smiley
LOS also was a lower volume plant, so that affected inventory more than at NOR.
Logged

Kurt S
CRG
JohnZ
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 3958


View Profile Email
« Reply #19 on: December 02, 2008, 02:37:52 PM »

And almost all the parts used at Van Nuys had to travel 2500-3000 miles by rail to get there (other than gas tanks, seat foam, and carpets, which were sourced locally), and they maintained a huge "buffer" warehouse and rail receiving facility next door to protect material flow from occasional inbound transportation failures. The escalating costs of inbound freight were the prime reason for eventually closing the plant (along with all the other GM, Ford, and Chrysler California assembly plants).
Logged

'69 Z/28
Fathom Green
CRG
1968RSZ28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4560



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: December 02, 2008, 04:10:12 PM »

And almost all the parts used at Van Nuys had to travel 2500-3000 miles by rail to get there (other than gas tanks, seat foam, and carpets, which were sourced locally), and they maintained a huge "buffer" warehouse and rail receiving facility next door to protect material flow from occasional inbound transportation failures. The escalating costs of inbound freight were the prime reason for eventually closing the plant (along with all the other GM, Ford, and Chrysler California assembly plants).

That's OK because we're building hi-performance cars once again in California...  http://www.teslamotors.com/

 Smiley

Paul
Logged
tim69camaro
Member
***
Posts: 164


View Profile Email
« Reply #21 on: December 03, 2008, 06:37:33 PM »

The seller wants $150 plus shipping for it. Has anyone purchased one recently? Is this a reasonable price?
Logged

Tim Bailey
Jerry@CHP
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 1443



View Profile Email
« Reply #22 on: December 03, 2008, 09:45:05 PM »

An original 9204 for $150.00.  What's wrong with it.  They sell in the $450-650 range for a nice original one.  Something does not compute here.

Jerry
Logged
tim69camaro
Member
***
Posts: 164


View Profile Email
« Reply #23 on: December 04, 2008, 05:16:28 AM »

It needs to be replated and rebuilt.
Logged

Tim Bailey
Jerry@CHP
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 1443



View Profile Email
« Reply #24 on: December 04, 2008, 08:25:14 AM »

We replate and rebuild for a wopping $130.00.  Like I said, what's wrong with that booster?  When it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

Jerry
Logged
tim69camaro
Member
***
Posts: 164


View Profile Email
« Reply #25 on: December 04, 2008, 09:51:13 PM »

Now I am concerned it is not an original booster. The photos are shown in the first post. Do you see a problem with the stamp or the date?
Logged

Tim Bailey
Pages: 1 [2]  All Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.084 seconds with 17 queries.