CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 22, 2014, 01:19:23 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
104667 Posts in 12246 Topics by 4719 Members
Latest Member: Baconcks
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  Decoding/Numbers
| | |-+  Cowl Tag Looks Odd?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Cowl Tag Looks Odd?  (Read 3459 times)
nwbalddog
Member
***
Posts: 59



View Profile
« on: September 12, 2008, 12:45:18 AM »

I am looking at a very clean 1969 camaro to buy, yet the cowl tag is alerting to me, it is missing the following at the bottom. It makes me leary! Build date is 01C (January 3rd week)

          GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION

     CERTIFIES TO THE DEALER THAT THIS VEHICLE

 CONFORMS TO ALL U.S. FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY

    STANDARDS APPLICABLE AT TIME OF MANUFACTURE
Logged

1969 Camarao Convertible
396/SS/RS/Auto
tom
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1133


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2008, 10:50:52 AM »

Post a photo of the tag.
Logged

69 X11 Z21 L14 glide
looking for a 69 export model (KPH) speedo
william
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 1168


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2008, 12:12:34 PM »

I have observed that omission on cars built at Norwood for European export.

Does the tag have a slot on one edge?
Logged
nwbalddog
Member
***
Posts: 59



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 12, 2008, 08:19:28 PM »

I tried to attach a pic, too large...it has a slot and I am told the car was sent to Europe actually
Logged

1969 Camarao Convertible
396/SS/RS/Auto
nwbalddog
Member
***
Posts: 59



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2008, 05:18:19 PM »

The date on the cowl tag is 01C...I am told thie following numbers are on the motor...do these date code numbers show the motor was built January 16th to 18th range of 1969, and is that too close to the cowl tag date?

Block 3955272 A189 Casting

T0120JG Stamp on Top

Heads 3931063 A169

Intake 3931061067 A169

Left Side Exhaust Manifold 3909879

Right Side Exhaust Manifold 3916178

Alternater 1100834 9A10

Carb 7029204 FF

Thanks
Logged

1969 Camarao Convertible
396/SS/RS/Auto
KurtS
CRG Coordinator
*****
Posts: 3213


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2008, 10:40:55 PM »

Title in London in April of 69.
Car was restored in 06.

Yes, the #'s look good. If you get a pic of the engine pad, I'd be interested in it.
Thanks!
Logged

Kurt S
CRG
nwbalddog
Member
***
Posts: 59



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 13, 2008, 11:34:21 PM »

Thanks KurtS:
My thought is for casting date and vehicle production dates these are too close together?

Thanks again for the help.
Logged

1969 Camarao Convertible
396/SS/RS/Auto
nwbalddog
Member
***
Posts: 59



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2011, 04:19:37 PM »

Kurt, any information you have would be great, as I have limited stuff that came w/ the car when I bought it.
Thanks
Logged

1969 Camarao Convertible
396/SS/RS/Auto
KurtS
CRG Coordinator
*****
Posts: 3213


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: March 05, 2011, 01:25:28 AM »

I sent you most of what I know in those emails a couple of years ago.
Logged

Kurt S
CRG
68camaroz28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 961



View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: March 05, 2011, 07:12:53 AM »

Let's see what you purchased!  Grin
Logged

Chick
68 Z/28 NOR 01B Orig motor/trans/rear
69 Z/28 NOR 07A Orig Block & GM Cross-ram/carbs
69 L34 Rest. Nova Father/Son Car
69 L78 Surv Nova Purch 4/69 31K miles
67 L89 Corv Tribute
68 Corv 427/400 Orig motor
07 Corv Z06
R 68Z build- http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=182584
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.081 seconds with 18 queries.