CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 23, 2014, 12:56:39 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106487 Posts in 12420 Topics by 4787 Members
Latest Member: Oilron14
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  Decoding/Numbers
| | |-+  trim tag is it OK 67 L78
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: trim tag is it OK 67 L78  (Read 3941 times)
rare4k
Member
***
Posts: 96


View Profile Email
« on: February 26, 2008, 11:38:29 PM »

there is a car on e-bay Item no# 190202189586 does the trim tag look OK?
Logged
red67l78
Member
***
Posts: 63


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2008, 07:09:26 AM »

I think it is a mistake.  The engine number of  20736 works out to be the 3rd week in April for production numbers.  Also the 103345 would be for a Sept. 66 car build.  Also my vin and my cowl tag number is only 50.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2008, 07:23:33 AM by red67l78 » Logged
red67l78
Member
***
Posts: 63


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2008, 07:24:02 AM »

I just looked at the picture of the cowl tag and it shows the 103345 which would make it made the first week of production for the 67 camaro.   I think the cowl tag date should be O8A for dating for car.  The 4K was not available yet. 
Logged
Mark
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 944



View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2008, 12:07:43 PM »

Only problem with that theory is that NOR and LA body numbers started at 000001 in 1967, not 100001.
Logged

Mark C.
1969 Indy Pace Car
350/300HP RPO Z11
firstgenaddict
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1255



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2008, 01:50:21 PM »

The tag looks out of place on the firewall... it looks newer. looks as though it was changed after the car was "restored"
Logged

James
Collectin' Camaro's since "Only Rednecks drove them"
 
Check out the Black 69 RS/Z28 45k mile Survivor and the Lemans Blue 69 Z 10D frame off...
https://picasaweb.google.com/112392262205377424364/1969_Z28_Restoration
red67l78
Member
***
Posts: 63


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2008, 03:27:39 PM »

Mark
according to crg web site the first car would be 100001.  So the 103345 would mean to me the 3345 car in production.  It shows both los and nor starting this way.  I went under the general info tab and thats what it shows.
My car starts with 249??? and is the 149??? car in production that comes out to be 2nd week in July
Charlie
Logged
KurtS
CRG Coordinator
*****
Posts: 3290


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2008, 05:27:55 PM »

In 67, VINs started at 100001; body #'s started at 1.
Logged

Kurt S
CRG
red67l78
Member
***
Posts: 63


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2008, 06:21:54 PM »

Am i thinking correctly on this.   Would the cowl tag number of 103345 mean that it is roughly the 3345 car in line starting from 100001 as the first car?   
Logged
rd67RSSS
Newbie
*
Posts: 10


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2008, 07:09:12 PM »

The biggest problem I see is its an 04A with a 4K tag.   With the first L78's coming out at the end of March (03C?) until near the end of April the L78's would have been tagged with a 4N.  After 04C or so they began to use 4K for L78's.   So I'm thinking for this to be a good tag it would have to be a 4N, and NOT a 4K....   Perhaps this car was an exception??? 
Logged
69yellowz
Newbie
*
Posts: 7


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: February 27, 2008, 07:47:32 PM »

Am i thinking correctly on this.   Would the cowl tag number of 103345 mean that it is roughly the 3345 car in line starting from 100001 as the first car?   

 No, your not.  As stated above with Kurt and Mark the cowl tag did not start with 100001, that was the vin. Im sure this is where you are confused.
Logged

Travis
69yellowz
Newbie
*
Posts: 7


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: February 27, 2008, 07:53:05 PM »

The biggest problem I see is its an 04A with a 4K tag.   With the first L78's coming out at the end of March (03C?) until near the end of April the L78's would have been tagged with a 4N.  After 04C or so they began to use 4K for L78's.   So I'm thinking for this to be a good tag it would have to be a 4N, and NOT a 4K....   Perhaps this car was an exception??? 

 I hate to disagree, but there are as far as I know no L78's with a 4N code.  The first few had a 4P code before going to 4K
Logged

Travis
69yellowz
Newbie
*
Posts: 7


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: February 27, 2008, 08:18:21 PM »

The tag looks out of place on the firewall... it looks newer. looks as though it was changed after the car was "restored"

 That trim tag sure looks like its been off the car to me. The car looks like it was painted then the firewall all with the tag off.  Then the tag reinstalled or installed and then painted black. You can see the overspray around the top of the tag where they didn't mask it off good.
Logged

Travis
Zedder
Newbie
*
Posts: 13


View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: February 27, 2008, 08:34:23 PM »

My old documented 4P L78 was built later than this car...04B, NOR 107984, VIN 7N207927, T0405MQ...
Logged
rd67RSSS
Newbie
*
Posts: 10


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: February 27, 2008, 09:11:47 PM »

I didn't mean to write 4N.  I meant to write 4P.... sorry.   That car should be a 4P, not a 4K....
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.075 seconds with 17 queries.