CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 17, 2014, 01:40:40 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97133 Posts in 11686 Topics by 4578 Members
Latest Member: ronhill
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  General Discussion
| | |-+  67 302 HEADS (2.02)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: 67 302 HEADS (2.02)  (Read 4798 times)
69X55SS
Newbie
*
Posts: 10


View Profile
« on: December 16, 2005, 01:49:32 PM »

A friend of mine is thinking about selling the heads from a 67 Z that he owned in the early 70's, They are complete and original. I verified that they are 1967 2.02 heads by the numbers but with as rare as these are I couldn't answer him when he asked what they were worth .... 

Anyone have a rough idea on a price range Huh

                                  Thank You
Logged
RAfbody
Member
***
Posts: 177


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2005, 02:30:15 PM »

What kind of shape are they in.  Bare castings, used but complete or fresh ready to bolt on?  It all makes a difference.  By the way, the casting numbers for the '67 302 heads were also used on lower performance engines in the 1.94/1.50 valve configuration so without a visual inspection, you can't tell if they are 2.02/1.60 heads.

Russ
Logged

Russ
69X55SS
Newbie
*
Posts: 10


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2005, 04:28:12 PM »

They are used and complete, original, and could be bolted on as is.

They are the 0462 - 2.02 heads, date code Feb 67

                           Thank You
Logged
RAfbody
Member
***
Posts: 177


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2005, 02:13:12 PM »

I would think they are worth between $300 and $400 in used condition.  IMHO
Logged

Russ
bjr68z28
Newbie
*
Posts: 19


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2006, 08:08:00 PM »

Maybe not completely original.   They would have been changed to the 2.02 valves.  I am interested in buying.  Do you have digital photos available?
Thanks,
Bill
Logged
RAfbody
Member
***
Posts: 177


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2006, 04:38:41 PM »

Maybe not completely original.   They would have been changed to the 2.02 valves.  I am interested in buying.  Do you have digital photos available?
Thanks,
Bill

I'm not sure what you mean.  All Chevy 302's come with 2.02/1.60 valves.
Logged

Russ
bjr68z28
Newbie
*
Posts: 19


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2006, 09:13:55 PM »

My intent was to say that not all '67 462 and 291 heads had 2.02 valves.  But could be changed.  Sorry if I confused anyone. 
Thanks,
Bill
Logged
big mike
Newbie
*
Posts: 2


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: February 10, 2006, 08:35:00 PM »

I've got a set of 291 2.02 1.60 heads with matching cast dates.  I believe they are F27.  is there any way to tell if they were originally 2.02 1.60?
Logged
JohnZ
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 3958


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: February 11, 2006, 02:30:15 PM »

I've got a set of 291 2.02 1.60 heads with matching cast dates. I believe they are F27. is there any way to tell if they were originally 2.02 1.60?

Note the machined relief in the chamber wall adjacent to the outside of the intake valve in the photo below of a 186 head with factory 2.02's; the 291 will look the same way if it had 2.02's from the factory. If it has 2.02 valves and the unshrouding cut isn't present, they were 1.94's from the factory and the shop that installed the 2.02's didn't make the unshrouding cut.
Logged

'69 Z/28
Fathom Green
CRG
big mike
Newbie
*
Posts: 2


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: February 11, 2006, 03:07:38 PM »

Thanks John.  based on what you have told me, i belive they are 2.02 1.60 from the factory. my understanding is they could have been on a 302 or a 327.  is there any difference that would distinguish one from the other or would they be the same for either application?  thanks.  Mike
Logged
JohnZ
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 3958


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: February 12, 2006, 01:57:56 PM »

They'd be the same for either application.
Logged

'69 Z/28
Fathom Green
CRG
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.08 seconds with 17 queries.