Author Topic: This stamp look original  (Read 1402 times)

dannystarr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1584
    • View Profile
This stamp look original
« on: September 05, 2021, 09:51:46 PM »
Not a great pic. I didn't  take it. Hard to see. But does the actual fonting look correct. And is it in the DB? ... nevermind, cant get the pic to load from my phone. I am traveling. I will try when at my PC. Danny

dannystarr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1584
    • View Profile
Re: This stamp look original
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2021, 03:06:06 AM »
OK,
 I am back at my computer. I will try to get this pic posted in the next day or so. ... Danny

dannystarr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1584
    • View Profile
Re: This stamp look original
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2021, 04:44:04 PM »
Here is the picture. NOT a great pic, broaching can't be seen. BUT, is the stamp/fonting original. This is in a Sept. '68 68' Z/28... Danny

jdv69z

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1239
  • 69 RS Z/28 52E
    • View Profile
Re: This stamp look original
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2021, 06:57:24 PM »
Sep 67?
Jimmy V.

william

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2764
    • View Profile
Re: This stamp look original
« Reply #4 on: September 17, 2021, 07:00:16 PM »
124378L305805 would have been built October of '67.

Was on ebay 2010. Body with the engine was not configured for a Muncie trans.
Learning more and more about less and less...

jwbavalon

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 31
    • View Profile
Re: This stamp look original
« Reply #5 on: September 17, 2021, 07:19:54 PM »
Wouldn't a October 1967 build have a engine suffix of MO? 

MO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 732
    • View Profile
Re: This stamp look original
« Reply #6 on: September 17, 2021, 11:57:48 PM »
Wouldn't a October 1967 build have a engine suffix of MO? 

Yes. All 68's required smog, so all should be the same code.

Petes L48

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
    • View Profile
Re: This stamp look original
« Reply #7 on: September 18, 2021, 01:16:15 AM »
Danny do you have any of the  block casting numbers? 

dannystarr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1584
    • View Profile
Re: This stamp look original
« Reply #8 on: September 18, 2021, 05:56:25 AM »
I was waiting for more info. I have nothing else at this time. I do know that it was in a Sept. of 1968 Camaro Z/28. So there is a that MP, which seems wrong. On eBay in 2010? was it a numbers matching car at that time for the ad? Guess we better let this one go. But is the stamp real for what it is?... Danny

KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5508
    • View Profile
Re: This stamp look original
« Reply #9 on: September 18, 2021, 06:14:54 AM »
It was a rolling shell.
Block 3914678, I217. It was an ME, overstamped to be MP.  No MP code in 68.
124378L305805
Kurt S
CRG

CantRepeat

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
    • View Profile
Re: This stamp look original
« Reply #10 on: September 18, 2021, 10:05:22 AM »
It was a rolling shell.
Block 3914678, I217. It was an ME, overstamped to be MP.  No MP code in 68.
124378L305805

After reading your post you can clearly see the top of the P is not stamped the same as everything else.
-Tim
67 RS/SS Vert C-1 797-Z LOS
EXDL 2EMGR 3SL
4P

169INDY

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
    • View Profile
Re: This stamp look original
« Reply #11 on: September 18, 2021, 02:35:30 PM »
Where is the Joe'Dirt Busted GIF?
Jim
68 SS/RS L35 Th-400 LOS
69 Pace Car L48 Th-350 LOS
68 Z28 M21 LOS

dannystarr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1584
    • View Profile
Re: This stamp look original
« Reply #12 on: September 18, 2021, 04:05:10 PM »
Thanx Kurt/William/Everyone.. It's a hard pass. Just a car, nothing special I guess. ... Danny

169INDY

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
    • View Profile
Re: This stamp look original
« Reply #13 on: September 18, 2021, 04:51:38 PM »
Ad Copy??
Jim
68 SS/RS L35 Th-400 LOS
69 Pace Car L48 Th-350 LOS
68 Z28 M21 LOS

dannystarr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1584
    • View Profile
Re: This stamp look original
« Reply #14 on: September 19, 2021, 03:55:08 AM »
No ad, sent to me by a friend. Or I should say, I didn't look for a "for sale" ad. No longer interested. ... Danny