Author Topic: Is this a restamp?  (Read 3918 times)

hihorse

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 233
    • View Profile
Is this a restamp?
« on: February 14, 2020, 12:50:18 AM »
Year is buggered up, someone tried to stamp 8 over the 9, but is the part number a restamp?

cook_dw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3986
    • View Profile
Re: Is this a restamp?
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2020, 01:43:21 AM »
I would prefer a more overall photo but it’s legit IMHO.  I’m sure others will have their own opinions though.

68camaroz28

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2233
    • View Profile
Re: Is this a restamp?
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2020, 02:21:56 AM »
I would prefer a more overall photo but it’s legit IMHO.  I’m sure others will have their own opinions though.
I’m with Darrell right wrong or indifferent!
Chick
68 Z/28 NOR 01B Orig motor/trans/rear
69 Z/28 NOR 07A Orig Block & GM Cross-ram/carbs
69 L34 Rest. Nova Father/Son Car
69 L78 Surv Nova Purch 4/69 31K miles
67 L89 Corv Tribute
68 Corv 427/400 Orig motor
07 Corv Z06
R 68Z build- http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=182584

hihorse

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 233
    • View Profile
Re: Is this a restamp?
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2020, 02:41:58 AM »
its a challenge to get a pic down to 200k, thanks for replies

hihorse

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 233
    • View Profile
Re: Is this a restamp?
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2020, 09:18:46 PM »

ZLP955

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2186
    • View Profile
Re: Is this a restamp?
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2020, 02:53:05 AM »
IMHO once anything has been done to an OE stamp, better to pass on it and keep looking.
Tim in Australia.
1969 04A Van Nuys Z/28. Cortez Silver, Dark Blue interior, VE3, Z21, Z23, D55/U17, D80, flat hood.
Sold at Clippinger Chevrolet in Covina, CA.
AHRA Formula Stock at Lions Dragstrip, NHRA E/MP at Pomona Raceway

Mike S

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2667
    • View Profile
Re: Is this a restamp?
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2020, 12:40:05 PM »
 I'm curious why alter the date stamp on an otherwise legit looking part number?
67 04B LOS SS/RS L35 Hardtop - Original w/UOIT
67 05B NOR SS/RS L35 Convertible - Restored

cook_dw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3986
    • View Profile
Re: Is this a restamp?
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2020, 01:44:54 PM »
Ignorance Mike.  I will have to disagree with passing on the alt.  If the price is below average due to the modifying of the stamp then I’d buy it.  Anyone that knows stamps or follows the dates (known date btw) will know this is legit.  Besides the stamp is hidden when installed anyways.  There’s my $0.02

hihorse

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 233
    • View Profile
Re: Is this a restamp?
« Reply #8 on: February 16, 2020, 05:56:46 PM »
I'm curious why alter the date stamp on an otherwise legit looking part number?
bought this at a local swap meet from a guy that sold his Z, not sure if this  alternator was from his Z and never made it back on the car before he sold it or he just bought it as an extra. I bought the alternator thinking that it was original but nowadays I see many unrestored questionable ones on Ebay. So I wanted to post it here for analysis and scrutiny .

firstgenaddict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2882
  • caretaker of 1971 LT1's 11130 & 21783
    • View Profile
    • Groome Family Automobiles
Re: Is this a restamp?
« Reply #9 on: February 17, 2020, 01:54:39 PM »
quite obviously it was originally a 9. 
James
Collectin' Camaro's since "Only Rednecks drove them"
Current caretaker of 1971 LT1's - 11130 and 21783 Check out the Black 69 RS/Z28 45k mile Survivor and the Lemans Blue 69 Z 10D frame off...
https://plus.google.com/photos/112392262205377424364/albums?banner=pwa

ZLP955

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2186
    • View Profile
Re: Is this a restamp?
« Reply #10 on: February 17, 2020, 09:23:42 PM »
Yes, 9B19 is a known and desirable date. Yes you can see the year digit was a 9 before the crude overstamp. Was it a 9 from the factory? Quite possibly. But equally, impossible to say for sure from those pictures. What it was once, is not what it is now, hence why in my opinion, I would pass - or at least not assign any more value than just another 37A alternator core.
Tim in Australia.
1969 04A Van Nuys Z/28. Cortez Silver, Dark Blue interior, VE3, Z21, Z23, D55/U17, D80, flat hood.
Sold at Clippinger Chevrolet in Covina, CA.
AHRA Formula Stock at Lions Dragstrip, NHRA E/MP at Pomona Raceway

hihorse

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 233
    • View Profile
Re: Is this a restamp?
« Reply #11 on: February 18, 2020, 02:53:46 PM »
assuming the 1100837 number is original , i had plans on using it on my '69 2D L78 camaro (N6042XX). I'm satisfied original date code to alternator is 9B19 and not 8B19 and not 0B19. Until i find a nice unrestored one ,one i have will do. I did pay more for it 'than just another 37A alternator core'. Thanks for all responses.

firstgenaddict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2882
  • caretaker of 1971 LT1's 11130 & 21783
    • View Profile
    • Groome Family Automobiles
Re: Is this a restamp?
« Reply #12 on: February 19, 2020, 02:14:34 PM »
I would use it as well... FWIW 837's were not made in Feb of 1968.
James
Collectin' Camaro's since "Only Rednecks drove them"
Current caretaker of 1971 LT1's - 11130 and 21783 Check out the Black 69 RS/Z28 45k mile Survivor and the Lemans Blue 69 Z 10D frame off...
https://plus.google.com/photos/112392262205377424364/albums?banner=pwa