Author Topic: Opinion on 1100814 Alternator stamp  (Read 5621 times)

dannystarr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1631
    • View Profile
Re: Opinion on 1100814 Alternator stamp
« Reply #15 on: August 07, 2018, 05:18:46 PM »
Looking at BOTH of my cars and some other pic's.... It looks like the 4 is to close to the one?   Danny

Tx-Z 302

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 219
    • View Profile
Re: Opinion on 1100814 Alternator stamp
« Reply #16 on: August 07, 2018, 05:31:01 PM »
Looking at BOTH of my cars and some other pic's.... It looks like the 4 is to close to the one?   Danny
    I had the same thought about the 1-4 spacing but I'm not an expert either.
Chris W

BULLITT65

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4398
    • View Profile
Re: Opinion on 1100814 Alternator stamp
« Reply #17 on: August 07, 2018, 07:07:48 PM »
Also noticed on the OP alternator picture no - (dash) after the date.

The stated originals have a - (dash).

Did they all originally have the dash?
1969 garnet red Z/28 46k mile unrestored X77
-Looking for 3192477 (front) spiral shocks 3192851 (rear)
-Looking for an original LOF soft ray windshield
-Looking for original Delco side post negative battery cable part # 6297651AV

z28z11

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
    • View Profile
Re: Opinion on 1100814 Alternator stamp
« Reply #18 on: August 08, 2018, 02:42:09 AM »
the depth, font and spacing mirror the original that was sold earlier.
Have another close look.

I should have put them side by side - there are some differences, but the similarities in the varying depths of the 1100814 stamping are danged close. Different fonts could be because of the date gap; I'm not trying to legitimize it, but it's pretty good at first glance. Still, a lot of money for an unknown without documentation.

Regards,
Steve
1968 Z28 M21/U17 BRG/W 1967 Chevy ll Nova SS 
1969 Z28 X77/M20/VE3 LeMans/W
1969 L78 X66/N66 Cortez/BVT
1969 Z11 L48/M35/C60/C06  1949 3100 5wd 235/6

firstgenaddict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
  • caretaker of 1971 LT1's 11130 & 21783
    • View Profile
    • Groome Family Automobiles
Re: Opinion on 1100814 Alternator stamp
« Reply #19 on: August 08, 2018, 06:57:15 PM »
The 4 at minimum is a bad character on the above alternator, the 1 stamp and the 4 stamp would have to have their margin spacing milled off to ZERO, they without doubt touch if not overlap. NO GO.
James
Collectin' Camaro's since "Only Rednecks drove them"
Current caretaker of 1971 LT1's - 11130 and 21783 Check out the Black 69 RS/Z28 45k mile Survivor and the Lemans Blue 69 Z 10D frame off...
https://plus.google.com/photos/112392262205377424364/albums?banner=pwa

pjbizjak

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 302
    • View Profile
Re: Opinion on 1100814 Alternator stamp
« Reply #20 on: August 08, 2018, 07:36:49 PM »
sorry to break in but is there a product out there to bring the finish back to the new look?
Pete

 

anything