Author Topic: CRG Shifter Report  (Read 16301 times)

KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5896
    • View Profile
Re: CRG Shifter Report
« Reply #30 on: April 06, 2016, 03:28:55 AM »
I don't have all the data on Hurst dates (especially Firebird) and am trusting what some others who have more experience have told me.
Maybe the date format changed midyear...
Kurt S
CRG

ko-lek-tor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1858
  • someday I'll get one finished
    • View Profile
Re: CRG Shifter Report
« Reply #31 on: April 06, 2016, 09:31:33 AM »
I don't have all the data on Hurst dates (especially Firebird) and am trusting what some others who have more experience have told me.
Maybe the date format changed midyear...
Not a criticism, but why was date gathering for shifters not a research topic or why not make it one? Like gas tank dates, which provided enough data to graph a conclusive pattern of tank dates, same could be done for shifters, I would think? I'll volunteer to get this started and collect and arange the data.
Bentley to friends :1969 SS/RS 396 owned 79
1969 SS 350 (sold)
1969 D.H.COPO replica 4spd. owned since 85
1967 302 4 spd 5.13

bcmiller

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4030
    • View Profile
Re: CRG Shifter Report
« Reply #32 on: April 06, 2016, 12:31:52 PM »
X2 on 68B2 off my 12B. I am/was beginning to be concerned that this shifter was not the OE. Not so sure now. Seems unlikely 2 have the same dates, but 6 months?. Anyone else?

I don't think there is that much reason for concern. :)
Bryon / 1968 Camaro SS 396 coupe - now old school 468 big block
1967 Camaro RS/SS 396 coupe L35/M40 - 4 generation family project
Looking for 68 Camaro with body # NOR 181016

jdv69z

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1275
  • 69 RS Z/28 52E
    • View Profile
Re: CRG Shifter Report
« Reply #33 on: April 06, 2016, 12:57:58 PM »
Thanks, I wasn't really concerned. I know my shifter is original, just thought I'd add some info from my car which might enhance info on this the topic overall. I had never really looked that closely at the date/batch code until the report, and had never seen the 6 before reading the report and checking my picture more closely.
Jimmy V.

bcmiller

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4030
    • View Profile
Re: CRG Shifter Report
« Reply #34 on: April 06, 2016, 08:55:30 PM »
Joe, I moved your last post on date codes into a new thread in the Research Topics and reports section.

This is the link.
http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=14476.0
« Last Edit: April 06, 2016, 10:13:04 PM by bcmiller »
Bryon / 1968 Camaro SS 396 coupe - now old school 468 big block
1967 Camaro RS/SS 396 coupe L35/M40 - 4 generation family project
Looking for 68 Camaro with body # NOR 181016

KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5896
    • View Profile
Re: CRG Shifter Report
« Reply #35 on: April 15, 2016, 03:52:36 PM »
I updated the article. Though the research is not complete, the date coding apparently goes by model year.
And I updated about the 69 3-speed handles.
Kurt S
CRG

cruizin69

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 47
    • View Profile
Re: CRG Shifter Report
« Reply #36 on: May 16, 2016, 06:12:14 PM »
I have a 02A car with the original Hurst shifter dated Jan 1969.

cook_dw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3985
    • View Profile
Re: CRG Shifter Report
« Reply #37 on: May 25, 2016, 04:50:31 PM »
Great info..  Glad to see this published.