Author Topic: 9N595707 M22  (Read 5939 times)


Nikke

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 51
    • View Profile
Re: 9N595707 M22
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2016, 12:16:53 PM »
Nikke

bcmiller

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4011
    • View Profile
Re: 9N595707 M22
« Reply #2 on: August 03, 2016, 08:38:00 PM »
I am not convinced that the stamps are genuine.
Bryon / 1968 Camaro SS 396 coupe - now old school 468 big block
1967 Camaro RS/SS 396 coupe L35/M40 - 4 generation family project
Looking for 68 Camaro with body # NOR 181016

69Z28-RS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5778
  • owner since 4-Apr-1976
    • View Profile
Re: 9N595707 M22
« Reply #3 on: August 03, 2016, 09:23:57 PM »
The VIn would correspond to around the 9-10th of Feb; only 2-3 weeks behind the trans.  Is this 'typical'?  The Transmission and the stamps are *very clean* and sharp... Does this raise your antenna?
09C 69Z28-RS, 72 B 720 cowl console rosewood tint
69 Corvette, '60 Corvette, '72 Corvette
90 ZR1 red/red #246, 90 ZR1 white/gray #2466
72 El Camino, '55-'56-'57 Nomads, '55-'57 B/A Sedan

Stingr69

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 901
    • View Profile
Re: 9N595707 M22
« Reply #4 on: August 04, 2016, 12:46:23 PM »
Anybody else think they look a little heavy on the strike?

Assembly/date code font does not look real good to me.

69Z28-RS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5778
  • owner since 4-Apr-1976
    • View Profile
Re: 9N595707 M22
« Reply #5 on: August 04, 2016, 01:05:38 PM »
Yes, they do look 'heavy' on the strike, but I'm not sure that alone is reason enough to discredit the originality of the transmission stamping..?
09C 69Z28-RS, 72 B 720 cowl console rosewood tint
69 Corvette, '60 Corvette, '72 Corvette
90 ZR1 red/red #246, 90 ZR1 white/gray #2466
72 El Camino, '55-'56-'57 Nomads, '55-'57 B/A Sedan

X33RS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1092
    • View Profile
Re: 9N595707 M22
« Reply #6 on: August 04, 2016, 06:01:19 PM »
Wouldn't necessarily scare me Gary, especially being soft aluminum.  I have a muncie here that has been in our possession since 1972, long before people cared about numbers,  and it's also heavy on the strike.

Stingr69

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 901
    • View Profile
Re: 9N595707 M22
« Reply #7 on: August 05, 2016, 01:37:28 PM »
Missing digit in the VIN derivative too. :~)

69Z28-RS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5778
  • owner since 4-Apr-1976
    • View Profile
Re: 9N595707 M22
« Reply #8 on: August 05, 2016, 02:41:21 PM »
You are right.. My partial trans stamp has the 'leading 1' before the 9...   Was the Muncie stamping totally consistent in this regards??  or are there 'known' original deviations from this practice?
09C 69Z28-RS, 72 B 720 cowl console rosewood tint
69 Corvette, '60 Corvette, '72 Corvette
90 ZR1 red/red #246, 90 ZR1 white/gray #2466
72 El Camino, '55-'56-'57 Nomads, '55-'57 B/A Sedan

bcmiller

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4011
    • View Profile
Re: 9N595707 M22
« Reply #9 on: August 05, 2016, 08:52:32 PM »
I prefer to not discuss inconsistencies in an open forum. But it's a free country.
Bryon / 1968 Camaro SS 396 coupe - now old school 468 big block
1967 Camaro RS/SS 396 coupe L35/M40 - 4 generation family project
Looking for 68 Camaro with body # NOR 181016

JKZ27

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 559
    • View Profile
Re: 9N595707 M22
« Reply #10 on: August 06, 2016, 02:24:21 PM »
Looks like someone went crazy with the "4" stamp.
John
69 RS/SS Cortez Silver, L48 MC1
68 RS Ash/Ivy Gold 327EFI M20

1968RSZ28

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6188
    • View Profile
Re: 9N595707 M22
« Reply #11 on: September 15, 2016, 07:37:05 PM »
No sale 8-28-16...

Reserve not met = $2999.00

Relisted 9-10-16...

http://www.ebay.com/itm/282170474209?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2661&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT

Paul

1968RSZ28

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6188
    • View Profile
Re: 9N595707 M22
« Reply #12 on: September 30, 2016, 11:14:47 PM »
9-29-16: "This listing was ended by the seller because the item is no longer available."

Paul