CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2015, 10:47:14 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
112299 Posts in 12901 Topics by 4938 Members
Latest Member: chevyglassguy
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  Restoration
| | |-+  Quarter panel window U-jamb seal fittment ???
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Quarter panel window U-jamb seal fittment ???  (Read 430 times)
Posts: 201

View Profile Email
« on: December 15, 2013, 10:11:14 PM »

I wonder if someone could comment on...or post a picture of how their quarter window u-jamb window seal is supposed to look installed. I have attached some pictures of mine that I am test fitting with a new quarter panel. It fits down into the cut out on the quarter panel OK but the inner top of the seal does not seem to conform in any way to the quarter panel. I have red arrows in my pictures showing the area I am talking about. It is just kind of hanging out there. I would have thought maybe that it would snap in place but there seems to be no correlation bettween the shape of the seal and the shape of the quarter panel where they mate up to each other.


Hero Member
Posts: 900

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2013, 07:31:38 AM »

Repro U seals leave much to be desired. The quarter needs to be modified to fit the seal's profile. The slot on the bottom of the seal that slides over the jamb is often filled with rubber and needs to be sliced out. They do not fit well on repro quarters nor did they fit well on my GM quarters 8 years ago.
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.075 seconds with 18 queries.